• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Braz. j. . vol.81 número5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Braz. j. . vol.81 número5"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texto

(1)

BrazJOtorhinolaryngol.2015;81(5):457---458

www.bjorl.org

Brazilian

Journal

of

OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY

EDITORIAL

Nasal

saline

irrigation:

therapeutic

or

homeopathic

Irrigac

¸ão

nasal

com

soluc

¸ão

salina:

terapêutica

ou

homeopática

Inchronicrhinosinusitis(CRS),andmanychronicairway con-ditions, theunderlyinggoalis torestore mucosalfunction withtreatmentsfocusedonreducinginflammation, remov-ingbacterialinfection(orbiofilm)and,critically,replacing lost mucociliaryfunction.1 Nasal irrigations have come to

playalargeroleinthemanagementofchronicrhinosinusitis andtoalesserdegreeinallergicrhinitis(AR).Whilesaline nasal treatments are offered in different forms, such as spraysandnebulizers,itishigh-volumenasalirrigationthat hasfoundan integralpartincurrenttreatment guidelines forCRS.

Nasalirrigationsmayappearnovel,butthispracticeof sinus care has its originswithin theHatha Yoga Pradipika fromthe 15th century. Jala neti is the practice of water (Jala)irrigationandthustheoriginsofthenetipot.There areseveralShuddikriyas,orbodycleansingpractices,within yogic traditions and neti refers tonasal cleansing. Other cleansingtechniquesincludetheuseofstring(Sutra),ghee (Ghrita),andevenone’sownurine(Swamootra).However it isJala neti,or saline irrigation,that hasdemonstrated effectiveness(thankfully).

Western medicine has not been ignorant of its bene-fits; the first description of nasal irrigation appeared in the British Medical Journal in 1895. In 2007, a Cochrane review onnasalsalinetherapy demonstrateda large shift in symptom improvementonmeta-analysisof randomized controlled trials, with a 1.41 standardized mean differ-ence (SMD) in favor of saline therapy.2 This represents

an improvementof1.41 standarddeviations onthe symp-tom scale compared to placebo and compares favorably tothetreatment effectobserved inother sinonasal inter-ventionswithintranasalcorticosteroidsforCRS(SMD0.49) and immunotherapy for AR (SMD 0.71). This large symp-tomeffectunderscoresitsgrowingpopularity.Whilemany alternative therapies lie ona spectrum fromplausible to preposterous,nasalirrigationrestsontheformerendofthe

Pleasecitethisarticleas:BarhamHP,HarveyRJ.Nasalsaline

irrigation: therapeutic or homeopathic.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol.

2015;81:457---8.

spectrum,not only for its effectiveness, but also for the substantiveresearchunderlyingitseffect.

Nasalirrigationisprimarilyamechanicalintervention.It doesnotdirectlyenhancemucosalimmunity(andmay tem-porarilyremove innate factors), nor is it a decongestive. Veryhypertonicsalineonlyactsasaprovocationtothe air-wayandisusedbyrespiratoryphysiciansforthatpurpose. Additionally,it does notdirectly enhance ciliaryfunction. Formany hypersecretory conditions, such as CRS, it may helpto temporarily improve mucus rheologybut it is the mechanical removalof inflammatorymucin that improves mucociliaryfunction.

InCRS, mucostasisisamajorcomponentof the patho-physiology. Although mucociliary dysfunction may be a primaryfactorinconditionssuchascysticfibrosis,itis usu-allya secondaryeventcaused byinflammation, appearing in chronic airway conditions such as eosinophilic CRS or bronchiectasis.Lossofciliatedmucosaandsquamous meta-plasiaarepartof thechronic remodelingchangesseen in CRS.3 As inthe lowerairway, some ofthese changesmay

notbeimmediatelyreversible,andtheroleofnasalsaline irrigationistoovercometheacquiredmucostasis.The abil-itytotemporarily(orpermanently)substituteforimpaired mucociliaryclearanceisessentialtosuccessfulsinus man-agement.

The role of the surgeon is critical for effective nasal saline irrigation therapy. Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) improves the access of topical therapies for both the mechanicallavageofmucinousproductsanddrugdelivery.4

Delivery of nasal saline and additional topical therapies is bestachieved with large volume devices.5 Low-volume

devicesdonotreliablypenetratethesinuses,andalthough nasalcavitydelivery occurs,thisisnottruesinustherapy. High-volumedevices(>60mL,butgenerally>100mL)have beenfoundtoimprovedeliveryintothesinuses.5,6The

def-initionof‘‘high-volume’’isarbitrary,butclinicalevidence suggests it is important for mechanical lavage and drug delivery.7 Unfortunately,high-volumedevicescanproduce

Eustachian tube symptoms and local irritation in 10---20% ofusers.However,theseareoftenmildandcomplianceis high.2

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.07.002

1808-8694/©2015Associac¸ãoBrasileirade OtorrinolaringologiaeCirurgiaCérvico-Facial.Published byElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrights

(2)

458 EDITORIAL

Low-volumedevicessuchasdrops,sprays,andnebulizers are nasal cavity therapies, and are used in the manage-mentofAR,buthavealimitedaroleinmanagingCRS,as theyhave limitedreachwithinthesinusesandprovide no mechanismforcorrectingmucostasisvialavage.

Conclusion

Nasal saline solutions are helpful in reducing mucosal inflammation,removing bacterialproducts, andimproving sinonasal function in CRS. Nasal irrigation enables effec-tive local pharmacologic management when true sinus distributionoftopicaltherapiesis required,primarily cor-ticosteroids, antibiotics, and mucolytics. The mechanical shear force that is provided by high volumeirrigations in thepost-operativestateislikelyamajorfactortomanage mucostasis. Current evidence suggests that optimal topi-calsinusdeliveryoccursaftersurgeryandwithhigh-volume irrigationdevices.Mostimportantly,theyarealow-costand welltoleratedtherapyforpatientswithCRS.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

References

1.TimperleyD,SchlosserRJ,HarveyRJ.Chronicrhinosinusitis:an educationand treatmentmodel. OtolaryngolHead NeckSurg. 2010;143Suppl.3:S3---8.

2.HarveyRJ,HannanS,BadiaL,ScaddingG.Nasalsalineirrigations forthesymptomsofchronic rhinosinusitis.CochraneDatabase SystRev.2007:CD006394.

3.BarhamHP,OsbornJL,SnidvongsK,MradN,SacksR,HarveyRJ. Remodellingchangesoftheupperairwaywithchronic rhinosi-nusitis.IntForumAllergyRhinol.2015;5:565---72.

4.RudmikL,HoyM,SchlosserRJ,HarveyRJ,WelchKC,LundV,etal. Topicaltherapiesinthemanagementofchronicrhinosinusitis:an evidence-basedreviewwithrecommendations.IntForumAllergy Rhinol.2013;3:281---98.

5.Thomas WW 3rd, Harvey RJ, Rudmik L, Hwang PH, Schlosser RJ.Distributionoftopicalagentstotheparanasal sinuses:an evidence-basedreviewwithrecommendations.IntForumAllergy Rhinol.2013;3:691---703.

6.OrlandiRR,SmithTL,MarpleBF,HarveyRJ,HwangPH,KernRC, etal.Updateonevidence-basedreviewswithrecommendations inadultchronicrhinosinusitis.IntForumAllergyRhinol.2014;4 Suppl.1:S1---15.

7.PynnonenMA,MukerjiSS,KimHM,AdamsME,TerrellJE.Nasal salineforchronicsinonasalsymptoms:arandomizedcontrolled trial.ArchOtolaryngolHeadNeckSurg.2007;133:1115---20.

HenryP.Barham, RichardJ.Harvey∗ RhinologyandSkullBaseResearchGroup,AppliedMedical ResearchCentre,UniversityofNewSouthWalesand MacquarieUniversity,Australia

Correspondingauthor.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic criteria for VM proposed by Neuhauser in 2001 against the crite- ria reviewed by the Bárány Society and the International

There was no statistical difference between the following variables: right and left ears ( p > 0.05) regardless of the stimulus used (linear or nonlinear click-evoked

Eighteen patients (17 with partial response and one case of complete response) underwent salvage neck dissection and 12 (56%) had evi- dence of residual disease. It is noteworthy

Objective: To describe the results of newborn hearing screening and the profile of mothers and newborns attended to in a low-risk maternity setting, and to correlate the

In a multivariate analysis, male gender and maternal smoking had a 2.5- and a 1.5-time greater chance of having a cleft,

The following variables were evaluated and correlated with final hearing recovery: age, gender, vertigo, tinnitus, initial degree of hearing loss, contralateral ear hearing, and

Objective: To investigate the presence of filamentous fungi in patients with dental roots near the maxillary sinus who had apical periodontitis treated endodontically, and to

Conclusion: Correlation between clinical phenotype and presence of LRV1 was not observed, although the frequency of the virus is two-fold higher in mucosal lesions than that found