• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. ortop. vol.49 número1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. ortop. vol.49 número1"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texto

(1)

w w w . r b o . o r g . b r

Original

Article

Blood

transfusion

in

hip

arthroplasty:

a

laboratory

hematic

curve

must

be

the

single

predictor

of

the

need

for

transfusion?

,

夽夽

Felipe

Roth

a,∗

,

Felipe

Cunha

Birriel

a

,

Daniela

Furtado

Barreto

a

,

Leonardo

Carbonera

Boschin

b

,

Ramiro

Zilles

Gonc¸alves

a,b

,

Anthony

Kerbes

Yépez

a

,

Marcelo

Faria

Silva

c

,

Carlos

Roberto

Schwartsmann

a

aComplexoHospitalarSantaCasadeMisericórdiadePortoAlegre,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil

bComplexoHospitalarSantaCasadeMisericórdiadePortoAlegre,HospitalCristoRedentor,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil

cCentroUniversitárioMetodista,UniversidadeFederaldeCiênciasdaSaúdedePortoAlegre,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received23July2012

Accepted23November2012

Keywords:

Arthroplasty,replacement,hip

Bloodtransfusion

Hemoglobin

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Objective:todeterminewhetherthelaboratoryhematiccurvemustbethesinglepredictor

ofpostoperativebloodtransfusionintotalhiparthroplasty.

Methods:the laboratory blood samplesof 78 consecutive patients undergoingtotal hip

arthroplastywasanalyzedduringfivedistinctmoments:onepreoperativeandfour

postop-erative.Therewasacountofhemoglobin,hematocritandplateletsofthepatientssamples.

Othercataloguedvariablesascertainpossibleriskfactorsrelatedtotransfusionalpractice.

Theycharacterizedtheanthropometric,behavioralandcomorbiditiesdatainthis

popula-tion.Thestudysubjectsweredividedandcategorizedintotwogroups:thosewhoreceived

bloodtransfusionduringoraftersurgery(Group1,G1),andthosewhodidnotaccomplish

bloodtransfusion(Group2, G2).TransfusionruleswereleadbyguidelinesofAmerican

AcademyofAnesthesiologyandtheBritishSocietyofHematology.

Results:atotalof27(34.6%)patientsreceivedbloodtransfusions.Thecurvesofhemoglobin,

hematocritandplatelettransfusionsbetweenG1andG2weresimilar(p>0.05).Noneofthe

analyzedriskfactorsmodifiedtherateoftransfusionrateintheiranalysiswithpvalue>0.05,

excepttherace.ThesumofclinicalcomorbiditiesassociatedwithpatientsinG1wasa

medianof3(95%CI2.29–3.40),whileinG2themedianwas2(95%CI1.90–2.61)withp=0.09.

Conclusion:thecurveinredbloodcellshaslimitedreliabilitywhenusedassoleparameter.

Theexistenceoftolerantpatientshematimetriccurvevariationsassumesthattheir

assess-mentsofclinical,functionalevaluationandco-morbidities areparametersthatshould

influencethedecisiontotransfusionredbloodcells.

©2013SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora

Ltda.Allrightsreserved.

Pleasecitethisarticleas:RothF,BirrielFC,BarretoDF,BoschinLC,Gonc¸alvesRZ,YépezAK,SilvaMF,SchwartsmannCR.Transfusão

sanguíneaemartroplastiadequadril:acurvalaboratorialhemáticadeveseroúnicopreditordanecessidadedetransfusão?.RevBras

Ortop.2014;49:44–50.

夽夽

StudyconductedattheDepartmentofOrthopaedics,HospitalSantaCasadePortoAlegre,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:feliperoth@yahoo.com.br(F.Roth).

2255-4971/$–seefrontmatter©2013SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrightsreserved.

(2)

Transfusão

sanguínea

em

artroplastia

de

quadril:

a

curva

laboratorial

hemática

deve

ser

o

único

preditor

da

necessidade

de

transfusão?

Palavras-chave:

Artroplastiadequadril

Transfusãosanguínea

Hemoglobina

r

e

s

u

m

o

Objetivo: verificarseacurvalaboratorialhemáticadeveseroúnicopreditordetransfusão

sanguíneapós-operatóriaemartroplastiatotaldequadril(ATQ).

Métodos: amostraslaboratoriaissanguíneasde78 pacientesconsecutivossubmetidosà

ATQforamanalisadasemcincoemperíodosdistintos(umpré-operatórioequatro

pós--operatórios).Verificou-seacontagem dehemoglobina,hematócritoe plaquetasdesses

pacientes.Foramanalisadascaracterísticasantropométricasecomportamentaise

comor-bidadesreferentesà amostra, paraverificac¸ãode fatoresde risco associados à prática

transfusional.Osindivíduosdoestudoforamdivididosemdoisgrupos:aquelesque

rece-beramtransfusãosanguíneaforamalocadosnoGrupo1(G1)eosquenãoareceberam,

noGrupo2 (G2).Ascondutastransfusionaisrespaldaram-sedoscritériosda Academia

AmericanadeAnestesiologiaedaSociedadeBritânicadeHematologia.

Resultados: receberamtransfusãodehemoderivados27(34,6%)pacientes.Asanálisesdas

curvasdehemoglobina,hematócritoeplaquetasentreoG1eoG2nascincovisitasdistintas

foramsimilares(p>0,05).Todososfatoresderiscoanalisados,comexcec¸ãodaetnia,não

apresentaramrepercussõesnosíndicedetransfusãoemsuasanálisescomvalorp>0,05.A

somadascomorbidadesclínicasassociadasaospacientesnoG1foimedianade3(IC95%

2,29–3,40),enquantonoG2amedianafoi2(IC95%1,90–2,61)comvalorp=0,09.

Conclusão: a curva hemática apresenta confiabilidade limitada quando usada como

parâmetroexclusivoeabsoluto.Aexistênciadepacientestolerantesàsvariac¸õesdacurva

hematimétricapressupõequeassuasavaliac¸õesdecaráterclínico,funcionalede

comor-bidadessejamparâmetrosquedevaminfluenciarnadecisãodousodehemoderivados.

©2013SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevier

EditoraLtda.Todososdireitosreservados.

Introduction

Theindicationforbloodtransfusioninprostheticorthopedic

procedures–especiallyhiparthroplasty–generates

disagree-ment amongmedicalprofessionals as the management of

post-surgicalanemia.1–4Thestandardizationoftransfusional

proceduresinthe post-operativemanagementwith

labora-torythresholdswasinitiallydonein1942,5becauseofthefear

ofcomplicationssuchasfatigueandinabilitytorecoverand

rehabilitatethepatient,togetherwiththehighcostsandwith

themorbidityand longhospitalstays. Further

understand-ingofhumanphysiologybroughtgreaterdoubtabouttheuse

ofpreset laboratory thresholdsfor transfusion.Because of

theriskofbleedingduringandaftersurgery,andofdrainage

andsecretionofthesurgicalwound,itsimpositionasroutine

practice was countered by the risks related to the

conse-quencesofitsuse.Wereportanassociationofthispractice

withhighestratesofsurgicalsiteinfection,4,6andincreaseof

post-operativepneumoniaindexandmortalityinthe short

term,and vascular events, besides autoimmune reactions,

systemicinflammatoryresponsesyndrome,andtransmission

ofcontagiousdiseases.6–8

Numerousguidelines depictthelocalexperienceof

spe-cificcenters,ordemonstratethescenarioofmedicalgroups’

proceduresinseveralcountries,9–11 but thereisnosupport

orspecific worldwidestandardizationfortheseconducts.12

Prominentstudieswarnabouttheriskfactorsassociatedwith

bloodtransfusions,beingadamantindefiningoptional

preop-erativemethodsforreducingthecostsandmorbiditiesrelated

totheuseofallogeneicbloodproducts.Theusebefore,during

andafterthesurgicalproceduresofsubstancessuchas

fer-roussulphate,erythropoietin,trenexamicacid,recombinant

factorVIIandfibringlue,andthepromotionofprotocolsof

autotransfusion,hemodilutionandrescueofredbloodcells,8

arethemainapproaches,althoughnotwithoutrisks,8tosolve

thisissue.4,6,13–17

Thegapsrelatedtotheconductsregardingtheuseofblood

productsledustodefinetheoverallfunctioningofthe

post-operatory laboratory hematiccurve ofpatients undergoing

primarytotalhiparthroplasty(THA)inthisorthopedic

refer-ral service. The objective wasto understandthe real need

forblood transfusions based ontheir laboratoryresults. In

thisstudy,possiblefactorsthatcouldinfluencethe

transfu-sionprocedureswereexamined,toexplainwhysomepatients

presentedclinicalandlaboratoryrecoverywithouttheuseof

bloodtransfusion,basedonabsolutenumbers.Thisanalysis

questionsandalertsaboutnecessaryprecautionsofroutine

bloodtransfusion.

Materials

and

methods

FromJanuary2011toJune2012thosepatientsundergoingTHA

inthe SantaCasa dePorto Alegre(HSCPOA) Hospital

Com-plex were enrolled inthis prospectivestudy.Seventy-eight

participantswererandomizedandprovidedwritteninformed

consent.ThisstudywasapprovedbytheHSCPOAinstitutional

ethicsand researchboard.Patientswithanyhematopoietic

(3)

Table1–Riskfactorsamongtransfused(G1)andnottransfused(G2)patients(comparisonbetweenmeansofparametric

continuousvariablesandmedianofthenonparametricvariable).

Variable(means±standarddeviation) Transfused(G1) Nottransfused(G2) Total p

Agea 56.44±15.07 59.58±11.82 58.5±13.02 0.31

Weighta 71.68±17.53 73.18±13.72 72.6±15.05 0.67

BMIa 25.97±5.58 27.59±4.57 27.09±4.97 0.17

MBPa 93.11 98.34 96.54 0.11

Preoperatoryhemoglobina 13.51±1.55 13.60±1.36 13.59±1.42 0.91

Trans-operatorybleedinga 540±272.11 414.84±142.37 458.98±205.08 0.019

Post-operatorybleedinga 262.42±219.52 218.66±175.35 238.56±205.27 0.09

Sumofcomorbitiesb(medianandCI95%) 4(IC95%2.29–3.40) 2(IC95%1.9–2.61) 0.09

CI,confidenceinterval.

a Studentt-test. b Mann–WhitneyU-test.

orinfectiouschronicliverdisease,andwithmalignanttumor

wereexcludedfromthestudy.

Patients rigidly followed a protocol for collecting data

through serial visits. The first visit (V1) occurred

preoper-atively (from seven to three days before surgery); in this

stage,firsthematimetriclaboratorytestsanddemographics

and physical data ofthe participants (gender, age,

ethnic-ity, weight,height, body weightindex [BMI], comorbidities,

alcoholism,smoking,and vitalsigns)were collected;inthe

secondvisit(V2),whichoccurredonthefirstpost-operative

day(6–12haftersurgery),thesecondlaboratory

hematimet-ricsampleanddataregardingsurgerywerecollected,andthe

drainageofthesuctiondrainwascalculated;thethirdvisit

(V3)occurredonthesecondpost-operativeday(24–48hafter

surgery),withthesameproceduresofV2;thefourth(V4)and

thefifth(V5)visitsoccurredinthefirst(between4and7days)

and thirdweeks (14–17 days)post-operatively, respectively,

andwerecharacterizedbylaboratorycollectionanddatafrom

latepost-operativeperiod. Inthe laboratoryevaluation, we

analyzedtheredserieshemocytometry(hemoglobin,

hemat-ocritandplatelets).Thesamplecollectionsweredoneduring

thehospitalstay(V2–V3–V4)andintheoutpatientclinic(V1

andV5).

Allpatientswereoperatedonbythesamesurgicalteam,

consistingoftwosurgeonsandtwoanesthetists.The

surgi-calroutineconsistedofcalculatingtheintraoperativebleeding

(throughthesuctionvolumeofthedrainsandbyweighingthe

pads)andofageneraldescriptionoftheprostheticprocedure.

Theanestheticroutinewassimilarinallpatients:spinal

anes-thesiafollowedbysedation.Theposteriorsurgicaltechnique

foraccessforallcasesofTHAwaschosen.Duringthe

clo-sureofthesurgicalplans,allpatientsreceivedclosedsuction

drains,whichweremaintainedfor48h.Themeanoperative

timewas98.3±4.2min(range:80–120min).Post-operatively,

all patientsusedprophylacticunfractionated heparin(5000

units 12/12h) for a minimum of seven days and vacuum

suction drain for two days. Nopatient received steroidor

anti-inflammatorymedication.Analgesicdrugswerebasedon

opioidsandnon-narcoticpirazolonicderivatives(dipyrone).

Theproceduresofintraoperativeandpost-operative

trans-fusion of the anesthetic/surgical team were obeyed, and

criteriabasedonguidelineswereusedintheirconduct.18,19

Blood products were used during surgerywhen there was

significant bleedingthat would interfere withthe patient’s

hemodynamicstatus.Theanesthetistwassolelyresponsible

fortheuse/degreeofthebloodproduct.Post-operatively,of

necessitythehealthypatientsreceivedbloodproductswith

Hb<7g/dL,whereasthosewithcerebrovasculardisease,

coro-naryarterydisease,peripheralvasculardiseaseandchronic

pulmonaryvasculardiseasereceivedbloodtransfusionswith

Hb<8g/dL.

Accordingtotransfusioncriteria,weallocatethepatients

intotwogroups:Group1(G1)–patientswhoreceivedblood

transfusion;andGroup2(G2)–patientswhodidnotreceive

blood products. In this study population, the participants

hadameanageof58.5±13(G1=56.4andG2=15±59.5±11.8

(p=0.31). Weightand BMI ofG1 and G2, respectively, were

71.6±17.5/25.9±5.5and73.1±13.7/27.5±4.5(p>0.05).

Preop-eratively,themeanarterialpressure(MAP)was96.54mmHg

(p>0.05)for G1(93.11mmHg)and G2 (98.34mmHg)groups.

Preoperative hemoglobin for G1 and G2 was 13.5±1.5 and

13.6±1.3(p=0.91),respectively(Table1).

Patients were sorted and analyzed by SPSS 17.0

soft-ware(Chicago,IL,USA).Forcontinuousvariables,descriptive

statistics demonstrated performance characteristics

(cen-tral tendency and dispersion). By the adherence test of

Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S),withthe Lillieforscorrectionof

normality, the normality of data was tested. Analysis of

variance (ANOVA) for hematological curves was adopted.

Additional tests(post hoc)were conductedto evaluate

spe-cificdifferencesbetweenmeans,bypairs.Intheanalysisof

risk factors, the discrete variables were assessed byYates

chi-square test,whereas forparametric and nonparametric

continuousvariables theStudentttestand Mann–Whitney,

respectively,wereused.Inallinterpretations,thelevelof

sig-nificancewassetatp<0.05.

Results

Twenty-seven (34.6%)patients received blood transfusions:

19 (55.6%) during surgery and 12 (44.4%) post-operatively.

The average intraoperative blood loss was 458.9±205mL

(G1=540±272mL and G2=414.8±142.3mL [p=0.019]).

Mean post-operative bleeding was 238, 56±205.27mL

(G1=262.4±219.5mLandG2=218.6±175.3mL[p=0.09]).

Thecurvesofhemoglobin,hematocritandplateletsamong

(4)

Table2–Hemoglobin,hematocritandplateletvaluesamongtransfused(G1)andnottransfused(G2)patientsinfive visits(V1–V5).

Hb(g/dL) Hb(V1)(g/dL) Hb(V2)(g/dL) Hb(V3)(g/dL) Hb(V4)(g/dL) Hb(V5)(g/dL) pa

G1 13.57±1.55 11.44±1.73 9.6±1.64 10.8±1.53 12.55±1.58 >0.05

G2 13.6±1.36 11.45±1.76 10.2±1.52 11.1±1.45 12.48±1.29

Ht(%) Ht(V1)(%) Ht(V2)(%) Ht(V3)(%) Ht(V4)(%) Ht(V5)(%)

G1 38.81±4.48 32.85±5.04 27.88±4.69 31.78±4.62 36.79±4.4 >0.05

G2 40.08±4.05 33.79±4.75 30.04±4.58 33.03±4.07 36.93±3.65

Platelets(mm3) Platelets(V1)(mm3) Platelets(V2)(mm3) Platelets(V3)(mm3) Platelets(V4)(mm3) Platelets(V5)(mm3)

G1(mm3) 250.69±43.23 231.92±77.11 270.5±77.4 466.75±114.9 283.78±67.99 >0.05

G2(mm3) 245.22±66.39 215.14±77.11 286.93±83.73 476.4±170.48 266.97±105.89

a ConsideringthecurveanalysisbyANOVAandateachrespectivevisit(V1–V5)intheposthoctest.

47 46 51

50 26

1

5 26 26 27

27 N =

Visit 5 Visit 4 Visit 3 Visit 2 Visit 1

HB (Mean values)

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

Transfused

Yes

No

Fig.1–Laboratoryhemoglobincurveamongtransfused andnottransfusedpatients.

normaldistributionintheirgraphicalrepresentation.Forall

analysesofthecurvesbetweenG1andG2,p>0.05.Whilethe

hemoglobinandhematocritgraphicsdatafollowedaparabolic

normalcurve,theplateletcurvegeneratedagraphwith

nor-maloscillation,representedbyacurvepeakduringthevisit4.

TheirvaluesareshowninTable2andFigs.1–3.

Thepopulationriskfactors were separatelyverified. For

parametric data such as age, body weight and BMI, mean

arterialpressure(MAP)andpreoperativehemoglobin,p>0.05

47 46 51

50 26

1

5 26 26 27

27 N =

Visit 5 Visit 4 Visit 3 Visit 2 Visit 1

HT (Mean values)

50

40

30

20

Transfused

Yes

No

Fig.2–Laboratoryhematocritcurveamongtransfusedand nottransfusedpatients.

45 45 49

48 23

9

4 26 24 24

26 N =

Visit 5 Visit 4 Visit 3 Visit 2 Visit 1

Platelets (Mean values)

600

500

400

300

200

100

Transfused

Yes

No

Fig.3–Laboratoryplateletcurveamongtransfusedandnot transfusedpatients.

(Table1).Exceptforethnicity,nonparametricvariablessuch

assmoking,alcoholism,cementedornotcementedimplant,

hypertensionanddiabeteshadanimpactonratesof

transfu-sionintheiranalysis,withp>0.05(Tables1and3).Thesum

ofcomorbiditiesassociatedwithpatientsinG1hadamedian

of3(95%CI2.29–3.40),whileinG2themedianwas2(95%CI

1.90–2.61)(p=0.09)(Table1).

Discussion

Thestandardizationoftransfusionalconductsisstilla

chal-lengingtopic.Inthefirststudies,datingfromthe1940s,5the

hemoglobin valueadopted forpost-surgerycontrolof

ane-miawas10g/dL.Thislimitwaschangedintheearly1990s,

withtheexpansionofknowledgeaboutthebehaviorofacute

(traumatic andsurgical)shockand withdetailedstudiesof

the use ofblood products in patients withsevere disease.

Theguidelines then began toorient the newtransfusional

conducts,18,19eveninspecificareassuchasorthopedia.20The

hemoglobinthresholdsweremodified,from10g/dLto7g/dL

inhealthypatientsandto8g/dLinpatientswithacomorbidity

(age>65years,withrespiratorydiseaseandocclusive

vascu-lardisease).4Fromthesenumbers,anotherargument,namely,

thepossiblesubjectivecriteriathatcouldguidetheconductof

every professional,regardlessoflaboratorynumerical

anal-ysis, emerged. This can be seen in studies that generally

(5)

Table3–Riskfactorsamongtransfused(G1)andnottransfused(G2)patients(associationbetweendiscretequalitative variables).

Discretevariables Transfused(G1) Nottransfused(G2) Total p

Gendera

Male 17(21.8%) 26(33.3%) 43(55.1%) 0.31

Female 10(12.8%) 25(32.1%) 35(44.9%)

Etnicitya

Caucasian 26(33.3%) 40(51.3%) 66(84.6%) 0.03

Black 1(1.3%) 11(14.1%) 12(15.4%)

Tabagisma

Yes 9(11.5%) 11(14.1%) 20(25.6%) 0.25

Not 18(23.1%) 40(51.3%) 58(74.4%)

Alcoholisma

Yes 14(17.9%) 19(24.4%) 33(42.3%) 0.21

Not 13(16.7%) 32(41.0%) 45(57.7%)

Hypertensiona

Yes 13(16.7%) 23(29.5%) 36(46.2%) 0.79

Not 14(17.9%) 28(35.9%) 42(53.8%)

Typeofprosthesisa

Cemented 19(24.4%) 30(38.5%) 49(62.8%) 0.31

Notcemented 8(10.3%) 21(26.9%) 29(37.2%)

a Yateschi-squaredtest.

conducts.2,12,20 Thosestudies portrayed divergent attitudes

towardtransfusionmeasuresamongdifferentcenters,2,21and

evenamongmedicalprofessionalsofdifferentsubspecialties.

Youngetal.1demonstratedthatsurgeonshaveamore

aggres-sivetransfusionconduct,especiallywhenhemoglobinvalues

rangedfrom7g/dLto10g/dL.Inthisstudy,fromatotalof44

patientswho hadhemoglobinlevelsbetween10and7g/dL,

27werenottransfusedwithbloodproducts.Thisimpliesthat

perhapsmorerestricttransfusionalmeasuresareadoptedin

thepost-surgicalarea.Webelievethatobjectivecriteriamay

loseitspowertoinfluencethepost-operativeperiod,by

subdi-vidingtheresponsibilityfortherecoveryofthehematimetric

curvewiththeclinicofthepatientsandtheirpotentialrisk

factors.However,thissituationdoesnotoccurduring

intra-operativetransfusions,which,althoughreliablyquantifythe

necessityofbloodreplacement,18,19represented55%of

trans-fusionsinthisstudy.Thisaggressivetransfusionalattitude

isexplainedbythesituationalanddynamicmedicalconduct

determinedbyintraoperativeacuteevents.Themainreasons

fortransfusionselected bythe anesthetistswere:transient

hypotensionunresponsivetocrystalloidsandtrans-operatory

disturbances ofcardiac and respiratory rhythm caused by

transitoryshock. Itisimportantto considerthat the main

guidelines are categoricalin theirconclusions. Theydefine

thattheabsolutenumbersarenottheonlydecisivefactors

exclusivelyfortakingperioperativedecisions,18,19despitethe

tendencyofmosthealthprofessionals,towardkeepingtheir

conductbasedsolelyonlaboratoryvalues.22

Itisestimatedthatintheareaofhipreplacementsurgery

theratesofbloodtransfusionscanvarybetween33and74%of

patients.4,8Thesenumbersreinforcethefindingsofthisstudy,

inwhich34.6%ofpatientsreceivedbloodproducts,despite

theoptionforthemorerestrictivetransfusionbehaviors.This

demonstratesthattheneedforimprovementoftheseindices

remainsachallengethatisawaitingforbettersolutions.

Inordertoascertainthepossiblevariablesthatinfluence

the transfusion rates, specific studies ofblood transfusion

in elective orthopedic procedures preferred tostick to the

main transfusion criteria, risk factors and use of optional

methods,4,6,12,14–16failingtoemphasizetheimportanceofthe

behavior ofthe laboratorycurve.In thisstudy, we

demon-stratedanobjectiveapproachtothebehaviorofthecurvesof

hemoglobin,hematocritandplatelets.Asaresult,wefound

behavioralsimilaritybetweenthetwoanalyzedgroups,and

this finding answered the question of the study: patients

generally have similar recoveryspeed of the hematimetric

values, regardlessof blood transfusion.From this premise,

someassumptionsareevident.Thereisasignificantnumber

ofindividualstoleranttosurgicalbloodlossbelowthe

pre-determinedthresholdsandthesepeoplepresentasatisfactory

functionalrecoverywithoutusingbloodproducts.22

Inordertoascertainthepossiblevariablesinfluencingthe

transfusionrates,specificstudiesofbloodtransfusionin

elec-tive orthopedic procedures has been either complied with

major transfusion criteria, risk factors and use ofoptional

methods,4,6,12,14–16 and did not emphasize the importance

of the behavior of the laboratory curve. In this study, we

demonstrated anobjective approachtothe behaviorofthe

curvesofhemoglobin,hematocritandplatelets.Asaresult,

weobservedbehavioralsimilaritybetweenthetwoanalyzed

groups,andthisansweredthequestionofthestudy:patients

generallyhavesimilarrateofrecoveryfromhematimetric

val-ues,regardlessofbloodtransfusion.Fromthispremise,some

assumptionsareevident.Thereisasignificantnumberof

indi-viduals toleranttosurgicalbloodlossbelowpredetermined

thresholdsandthatpresentasatisfactoryfunctionalrecovery

withoutusingbloodproducts.22

Inelectiveorthopedicsurgeries,thereisaneedfora

min-imum level of preoperative Hb, with the variant value of

(6)

limitingrequirements.Carsonetal.23,24foundthattherewas

nobenefitinfunctionalrecoverywithmaintainingHblevels

above10g/dL,eveninsymptomaticpatients(besidesvascular

disease),comparedwiththosewhomaintainedthebasallevel

below8g/dLafterhiporthopedicsurgeries.23Hebertetal.25

foundthatearlymortalityhasnotchangedin838critically

illpatientswhoreceivedaggressivetransfusion(Hb<10g/dL),

compared with those who had more restrict transfusions

(Hb<7g/dL). Viele et al.26 analyzed patients (all of them

Jehovah’sWitnesses)whotoleratedHblevelsbelow8g/dL,26

withadequaterecoveryandpresentedpreliminarydemands

onlywhenthelevelsreachedlessthan5g/dL(inassociation

withincreasedriskofmorbidityandmortality).Theindices

of hematocrit follow a tolerance threshold for transfusion

betweenvaluesof18–25%,18 andcanreach15–20%without

myocardial damage caused by lactic acid production.

Car-diacfailureoccurswhenthethresholdsarecloseto10%.3,18

Regardingplatelets,preoperativeminimumindicesare

rele-vantwhentheyarebelow50,000mm3,acircumstanceremote

frommostpatientsundergoingelectiveTHA–whichexplains

thenullratespecificforplatelettransfusions.

Thebehavior ofhemoglobin and hematocritcurves

fol-lowedaparabolicpathwithnormaldistributionofdataanda

downwardpeakwasobservedduringthevisit3;regardlessof

transfusion,thepeakhadreturnedtothebaselinethreshold

atvisit5.Thegraphicalrepresentationofplateletswas

pecu-liar,duetothecharacteristicoscillationbetweenvisits2and

4,andrepresentedanormalizedpeakfromthevisit5,not

cor-roboratedbyanyrelevantclinicalalteration.Withrespectto

thischaracteristicbehavior,wefoundnocomparative

analy-seswithotherarthroplastystudies.

Theassessmentofriskfactorsfortransfusionisofutmost

importance,sinceitpresupposesananalysisofeach

individ-ualthat, possibly,beapredictorofnormalvariationofthe

hematimetriccurve.Consistentwiththeliterature,thisstudy

suggeststhattheriskfactorsaresynergisticandcumulative.27

Thatis,theincreaseinthenumberofcomorbiditiesofpatients

wouldprobablybethevariablewiththegreatestimpactonthe

individual’spropensitytousebloodproducts.27

Riskfactors areinvariablydiscussed perse.Preoperatory

hemoglobin(Hb),27,28<12g/dLisapredictor thatinfluenced

theAderintoandBrenke,18seriesinupto70%oftransfused

patients. In our analysis, we did not give much

consider-ationtothisimportantpredictorofrisk,because theblood

transfusionsoccurredinequalproportionsinpatientswith

Hb<12g/dL(36.4%)versusHb>12g/dL(34.3%).Itis

notewor-thy that, at randomization, anemic patients (Hb<11g/dL)

wereexcluded.ManyofthesepatientsmentionedinAderinto

andBrenkelseries,8Salidoet al.28andPola etal.27showed

hemoglobinvaluesbelow11g/dL,implyingthatpreoperative

anemiaisthedecisivefactorintheriskoftransfusion.

Thevalueof12g/dLwouldbeasafetynumberfor

perform-ingarthroplastieswithlessriskofuseofblood products.28

Otherriskfactors alreadymentioned intheliteraturewere

notcorrelatedwiththeresultsofthepresentstudy,

includ-ingadvanced age,which isassociatedwith43%ofanemia

ofchronicdisease,4 females,4,6 comorbidities (e.g., diabetes

mellitusandsystemicarterialhypertension),lowbodymass

index – lean patients (risk near 40% in patients<70kg),

shortstature,typeofanesthesiaandsurgicaltechnique.8,27

Parker et al.29 statethat post-operativeanemia shouldnot

be toleratedin elderlypatients’ recovery,giving priorityto

aggressivetransfusionconducts(inassociationwithahigher

rate offalls, cognitiveimpairment,cardiovascularrisk, and

decreased qualityoflife).Somepeculiarcharacteristicsare

relatedtomalepatientswholosemorebloodinprosthetic

pro-cedures.Women,however,toleratelessbloodlossandhavea

higherriskoftransfusion.27Theuseofpost-operativeclosed

suction,29presentsfurtherevidenceoftransfusionriskin

elec-tivearthroplasties,aswellasdemonstratinglittlebenefitin

controllinginfectionsandhematomata.29Untilnow,nostudy

discussedalcoholismandsmokingaspossibleriskfactors,as

wellasethnicity.Inourstudy,blackpeoplehadalower

ten-dencytobloodtransfusion.Belletal.6associatedprophylaxis

fordeepvenousthrombosis(DVT)withunfractionated

hep-arintoincreasedchancesoftransfusion,butwithnoreason

established.

Interestingly,Carsonetal.24andPolaetal.27were

remark-ableintheestablishmentoftransfusionalconductsinpatients

undergoingorthopedicprocedures.23,30Theseauthors

deter-mined that, initially, the use of blood products should

precede objective parameters (laboratory indices), but that

thesubjectiveparameters(clinicalandcomorbidities’

analy-sis)rationalizethepracticeoftransfusion.Withthisobjective,

theyobservedadecrease inthe percentageandamountof

transfusionwithoutadditionalrisksofmortalityand

myocar-dial infarct.30 We support this transfusion practice and,

throughourstudy,weconfirmtoothepossibilityof

improv-ing the use of blood products. Other optional methods to

avoidtransfusionmeasureswithsignificancelevelstillhave

high costs (such as recombinant erythropoietin,4), or gaps

regardingtheirpracticity.4,11,13,15

Conclusions

Therateofbloodtransfusionamongpatientstreatedwithhip

arthroplastywas34.6%.

There is a pattern of behavior of the post-operatory

hemoglobinandhematocritcurvethatfollowsaparabolawith

normaldistribution. However,theplatelet curve followsan

oscillatorypathofthenormalcurve.

Thehematimetriccurvehaslimitedreliabilitywhenused

asthesoleandabsoluteparameter.

Theclinicalandfunctionalanalysisofthepatientandofits

comorbiditiesconstitutesthebestparametertoinfluencethe

decisiontousebloodproducts,inassociationwithlaboratory

evaluation.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

(7)

2. RosencherN,KerkkampHE,MacherasG,MunueraLM, MenichellaG,BartonDM,etal.OrthopedicSurgery

TransfusionHemoglobinEuropeanOverview(OSTHEO)study: bloodmanagementinelectivekneeandhiparthroplastyin Europe.Transfusion.2003;43(4):459–69.

3. NuttallGA,StehlingLC,BeighleyCM,FaustRJ.Current transfusionpracticesofmembersoftheAmericanSocietyof Anesthesiologists:asurvey.Anesthesiology.

2003;99(6):1433–43.

4. MunozM,Garcia-ErceJA,VillarI,ThomasD.Blood

conservationstrategiesinmajororthopaedicsurgery:efficacy, safety,andEuropeanregulations.VoxSang.2009;96(1):1–13.

5. AdamsRC,LundyJS.Anesthesiaincasesofpoorsurgicalrisk: somesuggestionsfordecreasingtherisk.SurgGynecol Obstet.1942;74:1011–9.

6. BellTH,BertaD,RalleyF,MacdonaldSJ,McCaldenRW,Bourne RB,etal.Factorsaffectingperioperativebloodlossand transfusionratesinprimarytotaljointarthroplasty:a prospectiveanalysisof1642patients.CanJSurg. 2009;52(4):295–301.

7. PedersenAB,MehnertF,OvergaardS,JohnsenSP.Allogeneic bloodtransfusionandprognosisfollowingtotalhip replacement:apopulation-basedfollowupstudy.BMC MusculoskeletDisord.2009;10:167.

8. AderintoJ,BrenkelIJ.Pre-operativepredictorsofthe requirementforbloodtransfusionfollowingtotalhip replacement.JBoneJointSurgBr.2004;86(7):970–3.

9. SturdeeSW,BeardDJ.Astrategyforreducing

blood-transfusionrequirementsinelectiveorthopaedic surgery.JBoneJointSurgBr.2004;86(3):464.

10.BoothD,KothmannE,TidmarshM.Astrategyforreducing blood-transfusionrequirementsinelectiveorthopaedic surgery.JBoneJointSurgBr.2004;86(2):309–10.

11.HelmAT,KarskiMT,ParsonsSJ,SampathJS,BaleRS.A strategyforreducingblood-transfusionrequirementsin electiveorthopaedicsurgery.Auditofanalgorithmfor arthroplastyofthelowerlimbJBoneJointSurgBr. 2003;85(4):484–9.

12.CarlessPA,HenryDA,CarsonJL,HebertPP,McClellandB,Ker K.Transfusionthresholdsandotherstrategiesforguiding allogeneicredbloodcelltransfusion.CochraneDatabaseSyst Rev.2010;10:CD002042.

13.CouvretC,TricocheS,BaudA,DaboB,BuchetS,PaludM, etal.Thereductionofpreoperativeautologousblood donationforprimarytotalhiporkneearthroplasty:theeffect onsubsequenttransfusionrates.AnesthAnalg.

2002;94(4):815–23.

14.FeaganBG,WongCJ,KirkleyA,JohnstonDW,SmithFC, WhitsittP,etal.Erythropoietinwithironsupplementationto preventallogeneicbloodtransfusionintotalhipjoint arthroplasty.Arandomized,controlledtrial.AnnInternMed. 2000;133(11):845–54.

15.Gonzalez-PorrasJR,ColadoE,CondeMP,LopezT,NietoMJ, CorralM.Anindividualizedpre-operativebloodsaving protocolcanincreasepre-operativehaemoglobinlevelsand reducetheneedfortransfusioninelectivetotalhiporknee arthroplasty.TransfusMed.2009;19(1):35–42.

16.HoKM,IsmailH.Useofintravenoustranexamicacidto reduceallogeneicbloodtransfusionintotalhipandknee arthroplasty:ameta-analysis.AnaesthIntensiveCare. 2003;31(5):529–37.

17.YamamotoK,ImakiireA,MasaokaT,ShinmuraK.Autologous bloodtransfusionintotalhiparthroplasty.JOrthopSurg (HongKong).2004;12(2):145–52.

18.Practiceguidelinesforbloodcomponenttherapy:areportby theAmericanSocietyofAnesthesiologistsTaskForceon BloodComponentTherapy.Anesthesiology.1996;84(3):732–47.

19.MurphyMF,WallingtonTB,KelseyP,BoultonF,BruceM, CohenH,etal.Guidelinesfortheclinicaluseofredcell transfusions.BrJHaematol.2001;113(1):24–31.

20.FeaganBG,WongCJ,LauCY,WheelerSL,SueAQG,KirkleyA. Transfusionpracticeinelectiveorthopaedicsurgery.Transfus Med.2001;11(2):87–95.

21.BoralessaH,GoldhillDR,TuckerK,MortimerAJ,Grant-Casey J.Nationalcomparativeauditofblooduseinelectiveprimary unilateraltotalhipreplacementsurgeryintheUK.AnnRColl SurgEngl.2009;91(7):599–605.

22.Vuille-LessardE,BoudreaultD,GirardF,RuelM,ChagnonM, HardyJF.Redbloodcelltransfusionpracticeinelective orthopedicsurgery:amulticentercohortstudy.Transfusion. 2010;50(10):2117–24.

23.CarsonJL,TerrinML,BartonFB,AaronR,GreenburgAG,Heck DA,etal.Apilotrandomizedtrialcomparingsymptomaticvs. hemoglobin-level-drivenredbloodcelltransfusionsfollowing hipfracture.Transfusion.1998;38(6):522–9.

24.CarsonJL,TerrinML,NoveckH,SandersDW,ChaitmanBR, RhoadsGG,etal.Liberalorrestrictivetransfusioninhigh-risk patientsafterhipsurgery.NEnglJMed.2011;365(26):2453–62.

25.HebertPC,WellsG,BlajchmanMA,MarshallJ,MartinC, PagliarelloG,etal.Amulticenter,randomized,controlled clinicaltrialoftransfusionrequirementsincriticalcare. TransfusionRequirementsinCriticalCareInvestigators, CanadianCriticalCareTrialsGroup.NEnglJMed. 1999;340(6):409–17.

26.VieleMK,WeiskopfRB.Whatcanwelearnabouttheneedfor transfusionfrompatientswhorefuseblood?Theexperience withJehovah’sWitnesses.Transfusion.1994;34(5):396–401.

27.PolaE,PapaleoP,SantoliquidoA,GaspariniG,AulisaL,De SantisE.Clinicalfactorsassociatedwithanincreasedriskof perioperativebloodtransfusioninnonanemicpatients undergoingtotalhiparthroplasty.JBoneJointSurgAm. 2004;86-A(1):57–61.

28.SalidoJA,MarinLA,GomezLA,ZorrillaP,MartinezC. Preoperativehemoglobinlevelsandtheneedfortransfusion afterprosthetichipandkneesurgery:analysisofpredictive factors.JBoneJointSurgAm.2002;84-A(2):216–20.

29.ParkerMJ,RobertsCP,HayD.Closedsuctiondrainageforhip andkneearthroplasty.Ameta-analysis.JBoneJointSurgAm. 2004;86(6):1146–52.

30.GroverM,TalwalkarS,CasbardA,BoralessaH,ContrerasM, BrettS,etal.Silentmyocardialischaemiaandhaemoglobin concentration:arandomizedcontrolledtrialoftransfusion strategyinlowerlimbarthroplasty.VoxSang.

Imagem

Table 1 – Risk factors among transfused (G1) and not transfused (G2) patients (comparison between means of parametric continuous variables and median of the nonparametric variable).
Fig. 1 – Laboratory hemoglobin curve among transfused and not transfused patients.
Table 3 – Risk factors among transfused (G1) and not transfused (G2) patients (association between discrete qualitative variables).

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The present study aimed to evaluate clinically and func- tionally patients undergoing tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a locked retrograde intramedullary nail for the treat- ment

Greater staining intensity was obtained In S (Synvisc ® ) and PR (Polireumin ® ) groups versus control group P (placebo – 0.9% saline); hence, the decalcified and stained slides

The aim of this study was to describe the surgical steps of a total hip arthroplasty in patients with DDH with dislocated hip, through an acetabular reconstruction with bone grafting

Arborescent lipoma is a rare benign intra-articular lesion char- acterized by diffuse replacement of synovial tissue by mature adipocytes, causing a villous lipomatous proliferation

The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: a tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections. Crit

6 described a case of arthroscopic resection of an osteoid osteoma located at the anterior border of the glenoid of a male patient aged 30 years, who had undergone two surg- eries

the tibial plateau using an L-plate, the patient again developed compartment syndrome.. © 2014 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia

1 – RX AP (A) and oblique (B), showing ossification of soft tissues of the radial and flexor diaphyseal faces of the proximal phalanx of the third chirodactyl, with irregular