• Nenhum resultado encontrado

J. Coloproctol. (Rio J.) vol.36 número1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "J. Coloproctol. (Rio J.) vol.36 número1"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texto

(1)

jcoloproctol(rioj).2016;36(1):4–7

w w w . j c o l . o r g . b r

Journal

of

Coloproctology

Original

Article

Neoadjuvant

radiotherapy

in

stage

I

cancer

of

the

lower

rectum

José

Alfredo

dos

Reis

Neto

a

,

José

Alfredo

dos

Reis

Junior

b

,

Odorino

Hideyoshi

Kagohara

b

,

Joaquim

Simões

Neto

b

,

Sergio

Oliva

Banci

b

,

Luciane

Hiane

Oliveira

b

,

Gustavo

Alejandro

Gutierrez

Espinoza

a

,

Antonio

José

Tiburcio

Alves

Júnior

a,∗

aServiceofColoproctology,ClínicaReisNeto,Campinas,SP,Brazil

bClínicaReisNeto,Campinas,SP,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory: Received12June2015 Accepted18August2015

Availableonline21December2015

Keywords: Rectalneoplasms Radiotherapy Mortality Irradiation

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Introduction:Themortalityrateinlowrectalcancerisrelatedtopelvicanddistant recur-rence.ForstageItumors,localexcisionhasbeingusedincreasingly,butrecentstudiesshow theneedforcautionwiththeuseofthistechnique,astheydonotconsiderthepossibility ofapositivenodeinstageIrectaltumors.Therefore,preoperativeradiotherapyshouldbe consideredforearlytumors,asanattempttopreventrecurrence.

Objective:ShowtheeffectivenessofneoadjuvantradiotherapyinstageIcancerofthelower rectumofacohortpopulation.

Materialandmethod:Acohortstudyinaprospectivedatabasewasmadewithatotalof538 patients,ofwhichwereconsidered75patientswithstageIlowerrectalcancer.Preoperative radiotherapywasperformedandpatientswerefollowedupforaminimumperiodoffive years.

Results:StageI/TIgrouphad27patients.Allofthempresentedcompleteresponsetothe treatmentanddidnotneedtobeoperated.Duringthefollowuptimeoffiveyears,this groupshowednorecurrencerate.ThestageI/TIIgrouphad48patients.Duringthefollow up,8patientshadtobeoperatedduetosuspiciouslesionorscar.Theyweresubmittedto fulltotallocalexcision.Afterevaluatingthepathologicalspecimen,noneofthemprovedto beadenocarcinoma.

Conclusion:Preoperativeradiation,notonlyreducedthelocalrecurrenceandmortalityrate inlowerrectalcancer,butalsoreducedtheneedforsurgeryinpatientswithstageIcancer. ©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeColoproctologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.All rightsreserved.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mails:antonioxxxv@yahoo.com.br,reisneto@lexxa.com.br(A.J.T.AlvesJúnior). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcol.2015.12.001

(2)

jcoloproctol(rioj).2016;36(1):4–7

5

Terapia

neoadjuvante

para

tumores

de

reto

baixo

estadio

I

Palavras-chave: Neoplasiasretais Radioterapia Mortalidade Irradiac¸ão

r

e

s

u

m

o

Introduc¸ão: Opercentualdemortalidadeempacientescomcâncerderetobaixoestá rela-cionadoarecorrênciaspélvicaeremota.NocasodetumoresnoestágioI,aexcisãolocalvem sendoutilizadacadavezmais;contudo,estudosrecentementepublicadosdemonstrarama necessidadedesetercautelacomousodessatécnica,pornãoselevaremconsiderac¸ãoa possibilidadedeumnodopositivoemtumoresderetonoestágioI.Portanto,aradioterapia pré-operatóriaéumaopc¸ãoviávelparaostumoresemfaseinicial,comoumatentativade evitarrecorrência.

Objetivo: Demonstraraeficáciadaradioterapianeoadjuvanteemcasosdecâncerdereto baixonoestágioIemumacoortedapopulac¸ão.

Materiaisemétodos: Foirealizadoumestudodecoorteemumbancodedados prospec-tivo,comenvolvimento,nototal,de538pacientes,dosquais75foramconsideradoscomo tendocâncerderetobaixonoestágioI.Nopré-operatório,ospacientesforamtratadoscom radioterapiaeseguidosduranteumperíodomínimode5anos.

Resultados: OGruponoestágioI/TIconsistiaem27pacientes.Todosobtiveramresposta completaaotratamentoenãohouvenecessidadedereoperac¸ão.Duranteoperíodode5 anosdeseguimento,nãohouverecorrênciasnessegrupo.OgruponoestágioI/TIIconsistia em48pacientes.Duranteoseguimento,8pacientestiveramqueseroperados,devidoà sus-peitadelesão,oucicatriz.Paraessescasos,optou-seporexcisãolocaltotalcompleta.Após aavaliac¸ãodosespécimespatológicos,nenhumdelestevediagnósticodeadenocarcinoma. Conclusão: O usoda radiac¸ão pré-operatória nãosó diminuiua recorrência local e o percentualde mortalidadeemcasosde câncerde retobaixo,mas tambémdiminuiua necessidadedecirurgiaempacientescomcâncernoestágioI.

©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeColoproctologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda. Todososdireitosreservados.

Introduction

Preoperativeradiotherapyincancerofthelowerrectumhas beenusedsince1975.1However,duringthelastdecade

sub-stantialprogresshasbeenmadeintreatmentmodalities.The surgicalmanagementcurrentlyincludesabroadspectrumof operativeproceduresrangingfromradicaloperationsto inno-vative sphincter-preserving techniques; new and improved radiationtechniquesemerged(conformalradiotherapy, intra-operative radiotherapy) with or without combinations of chemotherapies.2–5Themortalityrateisrelatedtopelvicand

distantrecurrence.6Therefore,adequatesurgicaltechniqueis

mandatoryinthetreatmentoftherectalcancer.6,7Also

crit-icalistheroleofprognosticfactorssuchasthepathologicT (tumor)andN(nodal)classification,circumferentialresection margin,andresponsetopreoperativetherapy.3Nodescanbe

positiveeveninearlytumors.8

For stage I rectal cancer, local excision has being used increasingly, but recent studies show the need forcaution withthe useofthistechnique,astheydonotconsiderthe possibilityofapositivenodeinstageIrectaltumors.3,7,8

Nowadays, appropriate staging plays an increasingly importantrole,becausemanytreatmentdecisionsmust be basedonpreoperativestaging.2,3

Currentguidelinesadvocateforneoadjuvanttreatmentfor stageIIandIIItumors,onceithasbeenprovedthat preop-erativeradiationreduceslocalrecurrenceriskand improve long-termsurvival.9–12

However,knowingthatpre-operativeradiotherapyisable todecrease,significantly,thenumberofundifferentiatedcells; diminishthegradeoftumorinvasionintherectalwall;reduce, statistically,theincidenceoflocalrecurrenceandalter long-termsurvivalrateleadstobelievethatneoadjuvanttherapy shouldbeusedinearlytumorsaswell,preventinga recur-renceratemanytimesreportedinstageIpatients.1

Objectives

ShowtheeffectivenessofneoadjuvantradiotherapyinstageI cancerofthelowerrectumofacohortpopulation.

Methods

Acohortstudyinaprospectivedatabasewasmadefrom1978 to2012,withatotalof538patientswithlowerrectum can-cer,ofwhichwereconsidered75patientswithstageIcancer. Theseindividuals weresubmittedtopreoperative radiothe-rapy.Theywere27patientsstageI/TIand48patientsstage I/T2.Allofthemhadlowerrectumadenocarcinomaandwere followedbya5-yearminimum.

Therewasnogender,raceandagedistinction.

(3)

6

jcoloproctol(rioj).2016;36(1):4–7

performedtoevaluatesizeandinfiltrationofthetumorbefore andaftertheirradiation.

Proctoscopy and digital examinationwere performed at diagnosis andafterthe endofthe irradiationtreatment to evaluatetumorextensionandwallinfiltration.

Preoperative radiotherapy was performed with 200cGy/dailyfor4consecutiveweeksuptoatotalof4500cGy, by means of a linear megavoltage accelerator (25MeV), in anteriorandposteriorpelvicfields.

Post-radiation protocol included periodical examination every 3monthsforthe firsttwo years,withdigital exami-nation(orcarefulperinealpalpation)and evaluationofthe CEAandevery6monthsforthenextconsecutivethreeyears. Abdominalultrasoundwasperformedyearlyandcolonoscopy everyotheryear.Whenclinicalassessmentsuggestedlocalor generalrecurrence,aCTscanorMRwasaccomplished.

Results

The75patientswithlowerrectumcancerwerefollowedfora minimumperiodof5years.

ThestageI/TIgrouphad27patients,allofthemsubmitted tothesameprotocolofneoadjuvanttherapy.Everyone pre-sentedcompleteresponsetothetreatmentanddidnotneed tobeoperated.Duringthefollowuptimeoffiveyears,this groupshowednorecurrencerate.

ThestageI/TIIgrouphad48patients,allofthemsubmitted tothesameprotocolofneoadjuvanttherapy.Duringthefollow up,8patientshadtobeoperatedduetosuspiciouslesionor scar.Theywere submittedtofulltotallocalexcision.After evaluatingthepathologicalspecimen,noneofthemproved tobeadenocarcinoma.Itwasfounddysplasiaandadenoma (Fig.1).

Onepatientofthisgrouphadadistantmetastasis,after5 yearsthatoccurredinthelungs(Fig.2).

Theother40patientshadcompleteresponseafter neoad-juvantradiotherapy.

Discussion

Treatmentofrectalcancerhasdramaticallyevolvedduring the last three decades shifting toward a tailored approach

27

48

75

0

8

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

total Stage I/TII

Stage I/TI

Patients Patients operated

Fig.1–Operatedpatients.

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Patients Local recurrence

Distant metastasis

Stage I/TI Stage I/TII 27

48

0 0 0 1

Fig.2–Followupresultsafter5years.

basedonpreoperativestagingandresponsetoneoadjuvant therapy.13

Preoperativeradiotherapyreducestheriskoflocal recur-renceinpatientswithoperablerectalcancerandrecurrence, especially locally, is responsible for the great majority of deathsinthefirsttwoyearsaftersurgery.14

Previous studies showed that there is a significant dif-ference in the five-yearsurvivalrates inpatients receiving preoperativeradiotherapy,whohadacorrectedsurvivalrate of80%versus34.4%ofnonirradiatedpatients.Thelocal recur-rence rate was2.9% inpatients that received neoadjuvant therapyversus23.5%inthosewhohadnot.1

Endorectalultrasound(ERUS)displaysaccuracyof71–91% and69–97%forTstage,and62–83%fornodalstaging.15Results

confirmedin200patients,thataftertheirradiationan involu-tionofthetumorsizeandvolumeoccurred.1

Comparingtootherstudieswhenpreoperative radiothe-rapywasnotusedtherecurrenceratewasmuchhigher.15–19

AccordingtoAguilar, patientsundergoinglocalresection presentedrecurrencerateof18%(T1)and 37%(T2)with54 monthsoffollow-up.

Patyetal.showedratesof17–74%forT1rectalcancersand 26–72%forT2cancerswithamediantimetorelapseof1.4 years(range0.4–7.0).

Patients undergoing localexcision withtransanal endo-scopicmicrosurgerypresentedrecurrenceof13%(T1),17%(T2) withfollowupof24months.18

Bebenekshowed4.4%recurrencerateforT1andT2intwo yearfollowupafterabdominoperinealresection.20

Ontheotherhand,Lezochshowedarecurrencerate simi-lartotheonepresentedinthisstudy,withnorecurrenceinT1 and2.85%inT2.Thesimilarresultsareduetotheuse preoper-ativeradiotherapybeforeperformingatransanalendoscopic microsurgery.21,22

Thoseresultsshownthatreceivingneoadjuvanttherapy carrieslessriskoflocalrecurrencethansurgicaltechniques that did notreceive pre operativeradiotherapy (local exci-sion, transanalendoscopicmicrosurgery, abdominoperineal resection,lowanteriorresection)(Table1).

(4)

jcoloproctol(rioj).2016;36(1):4–7

7

Table1–Riskoflocalrecurrence.

Localrecurrence T1 T2 Surgery

Aguilar(2000) 18% 37% LR

Paty(2002) 17–74% 26–76% LR

Stipa(2004) 13% 17% TEM

Bebenek(2009) 4.4% 4.4% APR

Lezoch(2002) – 2.85% RDT+TEM

ReisNeto(2012) – 2.6% RDT+SUR

throughendorectalultrasound,digitalexaminationand endo-scopicaninvolutiononthesizeandvolumeofthetumor.23,24

Thisstudydidnotcontemplatethepossiblecomplications presentedbyradiotherapy oralludedtomolecularanalysis sincethiswasnotitsgoal.

Conclusion

Inthiscohort,theuseofneoadjuvantradiotherapyreduced theriskoflocalrecurrence,themortalityrate,andtheneeded ofsurgeryinstage1cancerofthelowerrectum.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1. ReisNetoJA,ReisJAJr,KagoharaO,SimoesNetoJ,BanciSO, OliveiraLH.Adjuvanttherapyoncancerofthelowerrectum. Evaluationoftheeffectsofpreoperativeradiotherapyonthe prognosisofpatientswithcancerofthelowerrectum.J CancerTher.2012;3:912–9.

2. FicheraA,AllaixME.Paradigm-shiftingnewevidencefor treatmentofrectalcancer.JGastrointestSurg.2014;18:391–7. 3. DasP,CraneCH.Staging,prognosticfactors,andtherapyof

localizedrectalcancer.CurrOncolRep.2009;11:167–74. 4. KachnicLA.Adjuvantchemoradiationforlocalizedrectal

cancer:currenttrendsandfuturedirections.Gastrointest CancerRes.2007;1:64–72.

5. SauerR.Adjuvantandneoadjuvantradiotherapyand concurrentradiochemotherapyforrectalcancer.PatholOncol Res.2002;8:7–17.

6. WagnerTD,FakihMG,YangGY.ManagementofstageII/III rectalcancer.JGastrointestOncol.2010;1:112–9.

7. SauerR,RödelC.Adjuvantandneoadjuvant radiochemotherapyofrectalcarcinoma.Praxis. 2002;91:476–84.

8. PucciarelliS,CapirciC,EmanueleU,ToppanP,FrisoML, PennelliGM,etal.RelationshipbetweenpathologicT-stage andnodalmetastasisafterpreoperativechemoradiotherapy forlocallyadvancedrectalcancer.AnnSurgOncol.

2005;12:111–6.

9. LoosM,QuentmeierP,SchusterT,NitscheU,GertlerR,Keerl A,etal.Effectofpreoperativeradio(chemo)therapyon long-termfunctionaloutcomeinrectalcancerpatients:a

systematicreviewandmeta-analysis.AnnSurgOncol. 2013;20:1816–28.

10.KuluY,UlrichA,BüchlerMW.Resectablerectalcancer:which patientdoesnotneedpreoperativeradiotherapy?DigDis. 2012;30:118–25.

11.RödelC,TrojanJ,BechsteinW-O,WoesteG.Neoadjuvant short-orlong-termradio(chemo)therapyforrectalcancer: howandwhoshouldbetreated?DigDis.2012;30:102–8. 12.KimDY,JungKH.Radiationtherapyforrectalcancer.KoreanJ

Gastroenterol.2006;47:285–90.

13.QuirkP,SteeleR,MonsonJ,GrieveR,KhannaS,CoutureJ, etal.Effectoftheplaneofsurgeryachievedonlocal recurrenceinpatientswithoperablerectalcancer:a prospectivestudyusingdatafromtheMRCCR07and NCIC-CTGCO16randomizedclinicaltrial.Lancet. 2009;373:821–8.

14.Sebag-MontefioreetD,StephensRJ,SteeleR,MonsonJ,Grieve R,KhannaS,etal.Preoperativeradiotherapyversusselective postoperativechemoradiotherapyinpatientswithrectal cancer(MRCCR07andNCIC-CTGC016):amulticentre, randomizedtrial.Lancet.2009;373:811–20.

15.Garcia-AguilarJ,MellgrenA,RothenbergerDA.Localexcision ofrectalcancerwithoutadjuvanttherapy.AnnSurg. 2000;231:345–51.

16.SenguptaS,TiandraJJ.Localexcisionofrectalcancer.Dis ColonRectum.2001;44:1345–61.

17.PhillipP,NashGM,WongWD.Long-termresultsoflocal excisionforrectalcancer.AnnSurg.2002;236:522–30. 18.StipaF,LucandriG,FerriM,CasulaG,ZiparoV.Localexcision

ofrectalcancerwithtransanalendoscopicmicrosurgery (TEM).AnticancerRes.2004;24:1167–72.

19.SuppiahA,HunterIA,CowleyJ,GarimellaV,CastJ,HartleyJE, etal.Magneticresonanceimagingaccuracyinassessing tumordown-stagingfollowingchemoradiationinrectal cancer,MedicalResearchCouncil(UK)andtheNational CancerInstituteofCanada.ColorectalDis.2009;11:249–53. 20.BebenekM,PudełkoM,Cisar ˙zK,BalcerzakA,TupikowskiW,

WojciechowskiL,etal.Abdominosacralamputationofthe rectumforlowrectalcancers:tenyearsofexperience. Therapeuticresultsinlowrectalcancerpatientstreatedwith abdominosacralresectionaresimilartothoseobtainedby meansofanteriorresectioninmid-andupperrectalcancer cases.EurJSurgOncol.2007;33:320–3.

21.LezochE,GuerrieriM,PaganiniAM,D’AmbrosioG,Baldarelli M,LezocheG,etal.Transanalendoscopicversustotal mesorectallaparoscopicresectionsofT2–N0lowrectal cancersafterneoadjuvanttreatment.SurgEndosc. 2005;19:751–6.

22.LezochG,BaldarelliM,GuerrieriM,PaganiniAM,DeSanctis A,BartolacciS,etal.Aprospectiverandomizedstudywitha 5-yearminimumfollow-upevaluationoftransanal

endoscopicmicrosurgeryversuslaparoscopictotal

mesorectalexcisionafterneoadjuvanttherapy.SurgEndosc. 2008;22:278.

23.Habr-GamaA,PerezRO,LynnPB,NetoAS,Gama-RodriguesJ. Nonoperativemanagementofdistalrectalcancerafter chemoradiation:experiencewiththe‘watch&wait’protocol. In:SantoroGA,editor.Rectalcancer,amultidisciplinary approachtomanagement.SaoPaulo:InTechInc.;2011. Chapter17.

Imagem

Fig. 2 – Follow up results after 5 years.
Table 1 – Risk of local recurrence.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The probability of attending school four our group of interest in this region increased by 6.5 percentage points after the expansion of the Bolsa Família program in 2007 and

The sample included 120 subjects with bowel ostomy due to colorectal cancer and registered in the Outpatient Care Program for Stomized Peo- ple of the Health Department, Brasilia,

Although the result of electromyography showed improve- ment in the sphincter muscle function; especially in the fresh amniotic membrane group, but this difference was not

This study aims to take into account the importance of USG-3D in the evaluation of anorectal region and perianorec- tal tissues, in order to predict the best treatment to be chosen

In the context of complicated disease, usually manifested as an acute abdomen, the surgeon must be aware of this possibility to avoid misdiagnosis and treatment delay..

Aberrant crypt foci and colon cancer: comparison between a short- and medium-term bioassay for colon carcinogenesis using dimethylhydrazine in Wistar rats. Braz J Med

With the analysis of the spatial variability of the data, it was observed that the pens positioned in the central region of the two facilities had the least stressful places

The objective of this study was to model, analyze and compare the structure of spatial dependence, as well as the spatial variability of the water depths applied by a