• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Controls on hydrologic similarity: role of nearby gauged catchments for prediction at an ungauged catchment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Controls on hydrologic similarity: role of nearby gauged catchments for prediction at an ungauged catchment"

Copied!
33
0
0

Texto

Imagem

Table 1. Correlation of catchment properties with Nash-Sutcli ff e (NS) e ffi ciency of simulation.
Fig. 1. Location of all the 756 catchments (black triangles) within the continental United States.
Fig. 2. (a) Relationship between number of donor catchments and median NS values, (b) rela- rela-tionship between number of donor catchments and median, 75th percentile, and 25th percentile NS values, and (c) distribution of NS values of simulated streamfl
Fig. 5. Relationship of Nash Sutcli ff e e ffi ciency (NS) with (a) average distance from donor catchments, and (b) distance from nearest donor catchment.
+6

Referências

Documentos relacionados

(2) selection of an index streamgauge, (3) estimation of the daily flow-duration curve at the ungauged location, and (4) use of the index streamgauge to transfer the flow-

However, from these primarily selected catchments, final selection of catchments was done based on location of the pluviograph station, daily rainfall station,

The results of forecast error variance inflation shows that for both percentile and Z score interpolation, 2 P has bet- ter performance than P in most of the case basins – i.e.,

Based on the jack-knife procedure, the modified method considering catchment area with slope greater than 15% was evaluated in 17 gauged catchments in the Lower Mekong

This section presents the skill expressed in the selected skill scores of the seasonal streamflow prediction for the three forecast systems described (FS_S4, FS_ESP, and FS_ESPcond)

Ensemble-average change in the 20 yr return level minimum flow (left) and deficit volumes (right) due to only climate change between the corresponding time slices and the control

Daily streamflow is estimated by a four-part pro- cess: (1) delineation of the drainage area and computation of the basin characteristics for the ungauged location, (2) se- lection of

As model calibration can lead to non-unique sets of parameters, it is di ffi cult to as- sociate the parameters estimated through calibration with the characteristics of the