• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. ortop. vol.52 número6

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. ortop. vol.52 número6"

Copied!
6
0
0

Texto

(1)

SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ORTOPEDIA E TRAUMATOLOGIA

w w w . r b o . o r g . b r

Original

Article

Blood

level

changes

in

total

knee

arthroplasty

with

and

without

a

tourniquet

Marco

Felipe

Francisco

Honorato

de

Barros

,

Evandro

Junior

Christovam

Ribeiro,

Rafael

Gomes

Dias

HospitalRegionaldePresidentePrudente,PresidentePrudente,SP,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received6September2016 Accepted4October2016 Availableonline21October2017

Keywords:

Kneereplacementarthroplasty Surgicalbloodloss

Bloodtransfusion Tourniquets

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Objective:Toevaluatethedifferencebetweenthetotalbloodlossinpatientsundergoing primarytotalkneearthroplastywithandwithouttheuseoftourniquet.

Methods:Aretrospectivecohortstudy,withanalysisofmedicalrecordsofpatients under-goingprimarytotalkneearthroplastyin2015,withandwithouttheuseofatourniquet. Comparisonwasperformedofhemoglobin(HB)andhematocrit(HT)variationinthe com-pletebloodcount(CBC)duringthepre-andpost-operativeperiodbetweenthetwogroups.

Results:Therewere117patientsundergoingprimarytotalkneearthroplastyincluded, min-imumageof33andmaximumof86years,withameanof67years.64.1%ofthesurgeries usedatourniquetand35.9%didnot.ThemeanpreoperativeHBinGroup1was13.08and 12.97inGroup2(p=0.435).ThemeanpostoperativeHBinGroup1was11.64and10.93in Group2(p=0.016).ThevariationofHBinGroup1was1.44and2.04inGroup2(p=0.025). ThemeanpreoperativeHTinGroup1was38.96and39.01inGroup2(p=0.898).Themean postoperativeHTinGroup1was34.47and32.19inGroup2(p=0.005).ThevariationofHTin Group1was4.49and6.82inGroup2(p=0.001).Atotalof21patientsreceivedtransfusions RCC(redcellconcentrates),asaresultofHBbelow8g/dLorclinicalsymptoms,respectively, representingsevenofGroup1(9.3%oftotalintra-group)and14ofGroup2(33.3%oftotal intra-group),withp=0.001.

Conclusion: Inpatientsundergoingprimarytotalkneearthroplastyusinga tourniquet,a lowervarianceinthehematimetricindiceswasobservedandfewerbloodtransfusionswere necessary.

©2017PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.onbehalfofSociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopedia eTraumatologia.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

PaperdevelopedatHospitalRegionaldePresidentePrudente,Servic¸odeOrtopediaeTraumatologia,PresidentePrudente,SP,Brazil.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:marcofelipebarros@hotmail.com(M.F.Barros). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.10.001

(2)

Variac¸ão

sanguínea

nas

artroplastias

de

joelho

com

e

sem

o

uso

de

garrote

Palavras-chave:

Artroplastiadojoelho Perdasanguíneacirúrgica Transfusãosanguínea Torniquetes

r

e

s

u

m

o

Objetivo: Avaliaradiferenc¸aentrea perdasanguíneatotalem pacientessubmetidos à artroplastiatotaldojoelhocomesemousodegarrote.

Métodos:Estudodecoorteretrospectivo,comanálisedosprontuáriosdepacientes submeti-dosaartroplastiaprimáriatotaldejoelhoem2015,comesemousodegarrote.Comparou-se avariac¸ãodehemoglobina(HB)ehematócrito(HT)nopré-epós-operatórioentreosdois grupos.

Resultados:Foramincluídos117pacientessubmetidosaartroplastiatotaldejoelhoprimária, idademínimade33emáximade86anos,commédiade67;em64,1%dascirurgias,foiusado garroteeem35,9%,não.Nopré-operatório,amédiadaHBnoGrupo1foide13,08;noGrupo 2,12,97(p=0,435).Nopós-operatório,amédiadaHBnoGrupo1foide11,64;noGrupo2, 10,93(p=0,016).Avariac¸ãodaHBnoGrupo1foide1,44;noGrupo2,de2,04(p=0,025). Nopré-operatório,amédiadoHTnoGrupo1foide38,96;noGrupo2,de39,01(p=0898). Nopós-operatório,amédiadoHTnoGrupo1foide34,47;noGrupo2,de32,19(p=0,005). Avariac¸ãodoHTnoGrupo1foide4,49;noGrupo2,de6,82(p=0,001).Dospacientes,21 receberamtransfusãodeCH(concentrac¸ãodehemácias),porHBabaixode8ousintomas clínicos,setedoGrupo1(9,3%dototalintragrupo)e14doGrupo2(33,3%dototalintragrupo) comp=0,001.

Conclusão: Nospacientessubmetidosaartroplastiatotaldejoelhoprimáriacomousode garrote,ocorreuumamenorvariânciadosíndiceshematimétricoseummenornúmerode transfusõessanguíneasfoinecessário.

©2017PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda.emnomedeSociedadeBrasileirade OrtopediaeTraumatologia.Este ´eumartigoOpenAccesssobumalicenc¸aCCBY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Introduction

Totalkneearthroplasty (TKA)isaprocedurewithexcellent resultsinthetreatmentofdegenerativediseasesoftheknee, butitisnotfreefromcomplications1;itisassociatedwitha greatlossofblood,whichcanreachvaluesequaltoorgreater than 1.5L, asituation inwhich blood transfusion becomes unavoidable.2

Complicationsdependonfactorsrelatedtothepatient,the environmentandthesurgicaltechnique.3Toreducethe num-berofbloodtransfusionsinTKA,somecarehasbeendescribed tominimizeperioperativeand postoperativebleeding,such asocclusionofthefemoralmillingholewithbonegraft,use ofpneumatictourniquetandsuctiondrain,improvementof surgicaltechnique,useoftranexamicacid,localinfusionwith norepinephrineand,morerecently,theplacementofgelwith plateletsintheoperativewound.4

Orthopedicpatientshavearelativelyhighcontributionto bloodconsumption.IntheUnitedKingdom,forexample,10% oftheunitsofredbloodcellconcentrategiveninhospitals areconsumedbyorthopedicpatients.Ofthese,40%areused inpatientsundergoingTKAortotalhiparthroplasty(THA).5

Theuseofhomologous bloodcomponents isassociated withanincreaseinmortalityandmorbidity.Risksassociated withhomologous transfusions includethe transmission of infectiousagents,andnon-infectiousrisks(Table1). Homol-ogoustransfusionsarenotrisk-freeandareassociatedwith adverseeventsin20%ofcasesandseverereactionsin0.5%.6

Table1–Infectiousandnoninfectiousrisksassociated tohomologousbloodtransfusions.6

Infectiousrisks Noninfectiousrisks

Virus(e.g.,human immunodeficiencyvirus)

Acutetransfusionalreaction

Bacteria(e.g.,Staphilococcus aureus)

Latetransfusionalreactions

Parasites(e.g.,malaria) Febrilenon-hemolyticreaction Prions Allergicreaction

Acutetransfusion-associatedlung lesion

Graft-versus-hostdisease Immunosuppression PosttransfusionalPurpura Transfusionmistakes

Inordertoreducethehigh rateofbloodtransfusionsin TKA,itisessentialtoadoptstrategiesthatleadtolessblood loss. Theuse of aperioperativetourniquet allowsthe sur-geontohavean exsanguinousfield untilthe placementof thecomponentsoftheprosthesis;itimprovesthetechnique ofcementation.Themomentofitswithdrawal,however,is controversialintheliterature;itcanbedoneintraoperatively, soonafterprosthesiscementingfordirecthemostasisofthe wound,orafterthesutureandplacementofacompressive dressing.4

(3)

Material

and

methods

Aretrospectiveanalysisofthemedicalrecordsof117patients undergoingunilateraltotalkneearthroplastywascarriedout bytheDepartmentofOrthopedicsandTraumatologyofour institutionfrom January2015toDecember2015.All proce-dureswereperformedbyateamofsurgeonsexperiencedin totalkneearthroplasty.

Inclusion criteria was considered for patients with gonarthrosisandindicationoftotalkneearthroplasty,withno hemoglobinandhematocritchanges,orblooddyscrasiainthe preoperativeexams.Patientsonmedicationthatcouldalter thebloodcoagulationsystemwereinstructedtosuspendthat medicationbeforethesurgicalprocedure,andallhadnormal coagulogramsonthedayoftheprocedure.

Thesurgicalprocedurewasperformedthroughamedial parapatellarapproach,followedbyeversionandlateral dis-locationofthepatella,resectionofthemenisciandanterior cruciateligament,femoraland tibialcutaccordingto stan-dardizedtechniqueforkneearthroplasties.Thefemoralcuts were performedwithan intramedullary guideand the tib-ial with an extramedullary guide. All the prostheses were cementedandthefemoralorificeobliteratedwithbonegraft. Aftertheprocedure,allthepatientsremainedhospitalizedin theward,newhematimetrictestswereperformed,aswellas antithromboembolismprophylaxis.

Patientsweredividedinto twogroups,Group1withthe useoftourniquet, andGroup 2withouttorniquet. Theuse ornotoftourniquetwasdeterminedbythesurgeon’s prefer-ence.Inordertoanalyzethestatisticalsignificanceofgeneral andspecificinformation,patientsweredividedintothosewho usedatourniquetduringsurgery(n=75)andthosewhodid not(n=42).Thechi-squaretestforqualitativevariables (gen-der,operatedside,anduse ofRCC)and Student’st-testfor quantitativevariables(HBandHTbeforeandaftersurgeryand theirvariations)witha95%confidenceintervalwereapplied toevaluatehematimetricvariance.Datawereanalyzedusing Bioestat5.3software.

Results

All117patientswereincludedinthestudy.Group1consisted of75(64.1%),andGroup2of42(35.9%).InGroup1,theage rangedfrom38to86years(mean67),andinGroup2between 33and82(mean67).Regardinggender,Group1had55women and20men,andGroup2had30womenand12men.InGroup 1,theRsidewas46andtheLsidewas29,inGroup2theR sidewas22andtheLsidewas20.Inthepreoperativeperiod themeanHBinGroup1was13.08,andinGroup2was12.97 (p=0.435).InthepostoperativeperiodthemeanHBinGroup 1was11.64,andinGroup2was10.93(p=0.016).TheHB varia-tioninGroup1was1.44,andinGroup2was2.04(p=0.025).In thepreoperativeperiodthemeanHTinGroup1was38.96,and inGroup2was39.01(p=0.898).Inthepostoperativeperiod, themeanHTinGroup1was34.47,andinGroup2was32.19 (p=0.000).TheHTvariationinGroup1was4.49,andinGroup 2was6.82(p=0.000).Ofthepatients,21receivedRCC transfu-sion(redblood cellsconcentration),forHBbelow8or with clinicalsymptoms; sevenfrom Group1(9.3% ofintragroup

total),and 14fromGroup2(33.3%ofintragrouptotal)with

p=0.001.ThegroupsaredetailedinTables2and3.

Discussion

Thefirsttotalkneearthroplasty(TKA)wasperformedin1974. Sincethen,it hasbeeninpermanent evolution;it changes andimproves,despitebeingoneofthetwomostsuccessful orthopedicproceduresinthehistoryofthespecialty, along withhiparthroplasty.7

According to Vane and Ganem,8 in trauma and major surgeries,suchasTKA,inwhichthereisacutebloodloss, oxy-genationisthemainindicatorforfluidresuscitation.Thus, transfusions can be made with homologous blood, whose donorisforeign totherecipient, orwithautologousblood, whenthedonorandrecipientarethesameperson.Inmost cases,transfusionwithhomologousbloodisthemostused.8

Theuse ofhomologousblood componentsisassociated with anincreasein mortalityand morbidity,and has high financialcostsinvolved.Hopewelletal.9analyzed32studies relatedtotheincreaseinmorbidityandmortalityfollowing bloodtransfusionsandconcludedthatpatientsreceivingred bloodcellsconcentratehadahigherincidenceof complica-tionsandmortalitythanthosewhousedotherhemodynamic compensationmethods.

Homologoustransfusionsarenotrisk-freeand are asso-ciatedwithadverseeventsinabout20%ofcases,andsevere reactionsin0.5%.Therisksassociatedwithhomologous trans-fusions include the transmission ofinfectious agents, and non-infectious risks(Table 1).6 Inorder toreduce the high homologousbloodconsumptionbypartofpatients undergo-ingthesesurgicalprocedures,itisessentialtoadoptstrategies withlessbloodlossthatcanleadtobloodtransfusion.

Several hospitals have different transfusion protocols. Some studies recommend transfusion if hemoglobin con-centrationfallsbelow10g/dL.TheConsensusDevelopment Conference in 1988 suggested that a hemoglobin level of lessthan8g/dLshouldbethetriggerforbloodtransfusion.5 However,adequateclinicaljudgmentisimperativetodecide whetheratransfusionisneededinsteadofadheringto labo-ratoryvaluesalone.5,10

Therearenumerousstudiesanalyzingbloodlossintotal kneearthroplasty,andcomparingmethodsthatleadtolower blood loss.Smith andHing11 conductedameta-analysisin which15studieswereincluded(1040totalkneereplacement proceduresin991patients)andevaluatedtheuseofa tourni-quetasameasureforlowerbloodloss.Intheirreviewthey foundthattotalkneereplacementwithatourniquetwas asso-ciatedwithasignificantreductioninintraoperativebloodloss comparedtosurgerythatdidnotusetourniquet.Therewere no significant differences intotal blood loss, postoperative blood lossmeasured fromdrainagesystems,blood transfu-sionrates,timeofsurgery,andhospitalstaylengthbetween thetwogroups.Significantheterogeneitywasobservedinall theseresults.

(4)

Table2–Patientsinwhomatourniquetwasused.

Age Gender Sideoperatedon Usedtourniquet HBPRE HBPOS HBvariation HTPRE HTPOS HTvariation

64 F Right Yes 3 10.6 2.4 39 31.4 7.60

74 F Right Yes 4.3 13.9 0.4 41.4 39.7 1.70

76 F Right Yes 11.1 12.8 −1.7 32.5 38.7 −6.20

79 F Left Yes 12.8 12 0.8 38.9 35.6 3.30

72 F Left Yes 13 11.8 1.2 36.8 33 3.80

68 F Right Yes 12.8 10.3 2.5 38 30.5 7.50

62 F Left Yes 12 10.5 1.5 35.7 30.7 5.00

71 F Right Yes 13.9 13.4 0.5 41 39.8 1.20

65 F Right Yes 13.3 10.6 2.7 38.7 32.2 6.50

47 M Right Yes 12.6 10.2 2.4 36.5 29.5 7.00

75 M Left Yes 14.8 14.7 0.1 42.5 42.2 0.30

72 F Right Yes 10.3 10.3 0 30.5 31.6 −1.10

68 F Left Yes 13.9 11.1 2.8 38.9 33.7 5.20

59 F Right Yes 13.6 12.5 1.1 42.7 36.5 6.20

60 F Left Yes 13.3 11.5 1.8 39.5 34.1 5.40

62 F Right Yes 14 10.9 3.1 41.9 33.1 8.80

69 M Right Yes 14.2 12.7 1.5 42.7 37.3 5.40

74 F Left Yes 12.3 11.9 0.4 36.9 35.7 1.20

66 M Right Yes 14.4 12.6 1.8 40.9 35.8 5.10

69 M Left Yes 15.2 14.5 0.7 44.8 41 3.80

60 M Left Yes 13.9 12.5 1.4 40 34.5 5.50

75 F Right Yes 11.9 11.5 0.4 34.6 33.5 1.10

64 F Left Yes 11.4 10.3 1.1 35.6 32.6 3.00

63 F Left Yes 14 13.4 0.6 40.4 38 2.40

71 M Right Yes 14.5 11.6 2.9 40.4 31.9 8.50

77 F Right Yes 13.9 12.6 1.3 40.3 36.8 3.50

52 F Right Yes 12.3 11.6 0.7 35.3 33.4 1.90

76 M Right Yes 12.9 12.1 0.8 41.1 39.3 1.80

59 F Left Yes 16.6 13.6 3 46.6 38.6 8.00

68 F Right Yes 13.1 12.5 0.6 38.2 32.1 6.10

71 F Right Yes 11.8 9.5a 2.3 34.6 27 7.60

65 F Left Yes 12.2 12 0.2 35.9 33.8 2.10

72 F Right Yes 12.8 11.1 1.7 38 32.1 5.90

71 F Left Yes 13.7 12.5 1.2 41 37.2 3.80

74 F Right Yes 14 11.7 2.3 42 35.3 6.70

62 M Left Yes 15 12.4 2.6 44.4 37.1 7.30

69 F Right Yes 15.3 12.6 2.7 46.4 39 7.40

59 F Left Yes 11.4 10.4 1 33.7 32.3 1.40

70 F Right Yes 12.5 11 1.5 36.9 33.3 3.60

77 F Right Yes 13.5 11.1 2.4 40 33.3 6.70

59 F Right Yes 13 12 1 37.9 36.9 1.00

65 F Right Yes 13.5 10.5 3 41.3 33.2 8.10

66 F Left Yes 14.5 14.4 0.1 42.8 42.5 0.30

67 F Left Yes 13.9 11.4 2.5 42.1 35.6 6.50

53 F Right Yes 13.7 11 2.7 40.4 32.4 8.00

57 M Right Yes 11.5 10.2 1.3 34.8 30.4 4.40

71 F Left Yes 12 10.5 1.5 36.4 32.6 3.80

73 F Right Yes 12.1 11.5 0.6 36.4 30.2 6.20

66 F Right Yes 10.4 9.9 0.5 33.7 29.3 4.40

49 F Left Yes 10.5 8.9a 1.6 35.5 30.8 4.70

69 M Right Yes 13.7 11.1 2.6 39.5 34 5.50

86 M Right Yes 12.7 12.1 0.6 38.7 37.9 0.80

65 M Right Yes 14.9 14.1 0.8 45.3 43.7 1.60

59 M Right Yes 13.3 12 1.3 38.7 35.9 2.80

63 M Left Yes 11.7 9.5a 2.2 37.2 31 6.20

59 F Right Yes 10.6 9.5a 1.1 32.5 30.2 2.30

66 F Left Yes 10.5 9.1a 1.4 33.4 27.8 5.60

74 M Right Yes 12.5 11.4 1.1 37.3 34.1 3.20

64 M Left Yes 13 12.1 0.9 39.1 32.4 6.70

38 M Right Yes 15.5 14 1.5 46.7 42.3 4.40

78 M Right Yes 15.6 14.2 1.4 45.3 42.5 2.80

64 F Left Yes 14.3 13.9 0.4 41.7 38.3 3.40

80 F Right Yes 10.8 8.8a 2 34.9 28.1 6.80

(5)

–Table2(Continued)

Age Gender Sideoperatedon Usedtourniquet HBPRE HBPOS HBvariation HTPRE HTPOS HTvariation

82 F Right Yes 12.1 11.2 0.9 37.2 34 3.20

70 F Left Yes 12.9 11 1.9 38.6 32.6 6.00

59 F Right Yes 13.1 9.6a 3.5 38.5 28.1 10.40

75 F Left Yes 12.3 10.4 1.9 36.3 29.3 7.00

72 F Left Yes 13.3 12.5 0.8 38.4 32 6.40

60 M Right Yes 14.3 13.4 0.9 43 37.4 5.60

39 F Right Yes 13.3 12.2 1.1 37.8 35.4 2.40

67 F Left Yes 12.3 10.6 1.7 36.3 31.3 5.00

70 F Right Yes 13.3 9.8 3.5 39.8 29.6 10.20

72 F Left Yes 12.4 12.2 0.2 39.4 38.3 1.10

62 F Right Yes 13.4 11.9 1.5 42.7 38.7 4.00

Averagestandarddeviation 13.08±1.32 11.64±1.41 1.44±0.96 38.96±3.51 34.47±3.89 4.49±2.80

a Receivedredbloodcellsconcentrate.

Table3–Patientsinwhomatourniquetwasnotused.

Age Gender Sideoperatedon Usedtourniquet HBPRE HBPOS HBvariation HTPRE HTPOS HTvariation

75 M Right No 14.7 13.6 1.1 42.5 39.3 3.20

56 M Right No 14.8 11.4 3.4 42.3 33 9.30

64 F Left No 9.8 8.8a 1 29.6 26.1 3.50

65 F Right No 11.8 10.5 1.3 36 32.1 3.90

69 F Left No 12.3 10.5 1.8 36.2 30.4 5.80

62 M Right No 13.5 12.4 1.1 40.2 36.5 3.70

71 F Right No 11.2 9.2a 2 37 29.5 7.50

65 M Right No 16 11.6 4.4 46.5 33.8 12.70

33 F Left No 12.5 11.3 1.2 40 34.2 5.80

73 M Left No 14.8 13.7 1.1 49.9 38.1 11.80

82 F Left No 12.9 9.4a 3.5 39.1 27.5 11.60

69 F Right No 10.5 9.2a 1.3 30.8 27.2 3.60

76 F Right No 11 9.3a 1.7 34.2 29.4 4.80

47 F Right No 15.8 13.4 2.4 44.5 38.5 6.00

47 F Left No 11.9 9.7a 2.2 37.3 28.8 8.50

67 F Right No 13.9 9.5a 4.4 39.9 27.3 12.60

66 F Right No 10.5 9.1a 1.4 32.5 28.3 4.20

70 F Left No 13.9 10.5 3.4 40.5 30.1 10.40

76 M Right No 15 13.1 1.9 42.5 38.4 4.10

64 F Right No 12.6 9a 3.6 36.3 26 10.30

62 F Right No 12.4 11.2 1.2 36.8 33.4 3.40

68 M Left No 13.4 13.4 0 37.9 31.1 6.80

74 F Left No 13.6 8.3a 5.3 40.1 24.2 15.90

72 F Right No 12.7 11.7 1 36 33.5 2.50

56 F Left No 12.8 11.2 1.6 39.3 34.5 4.80

61 F Right No 12.9 10.3 2.6 39.7 31.3 8.40

76 M Left No 12.7 11.6 1.1 39.6 35.7 3.90

60 M Right No 14.7 11.2 3.5 43.8 32.7 11.10

66 F Left No 12.7 12.7 0 39.1 30 9.10

79 F Left No 11.7 8.7a 3 36.6 28.1 8.50

77 M Left No 10.1 7.5a 2.6 33.6 24.4 9.20

69 F Left No 13.2 12.3 0.9 41.7 38.3 3.40

69 F Right No 13.7 12 1.7 42 37.3 4.70

67 F Left No 12.5 9.8 2.7 39.7 30 9.70

71 F Left No 11.2 9.2a 2 37 29.5 7.50

49 M Right No 14.2 12.3 1.9 41.8 36.2 5.60

68 F Right No 13.5 12.6 0.9 37.6 36.2 1.40

67 F Left No 11.1 9.5a 1.6 34.6 29.8 4.80

65 F Right No 13.5 12.3 1.2 40 37 3.00

72 F Left No 13.8 11.8 2 40.3 34.2 6.10

79 M Left No 14.7 12.6 2.1 41.5 36.6 4.90

74 F Right No 14.3 11.5 2.8 41.9 33.5 8.40

Averagestandarddeviation 12.97±1.52 10.93±1.63 2.04±1.17 39.01±3.95 32.19±4.18 6.82±3.37

(6)

preserving blood stock, however, is controversial. Vasconcelos4 observed that the removal of the intraoper-ative or postoperative tourniquet showed no difference in blood loss when comparing hemoglobin and hematocrit variationinthepreandpostoperativeperiod.

Conclusion

Inpatientsundergoingtotalkneearthroplastywiththeuse ofatourniquet,therewas alower varianceinthe hemati-metricrates,andalowernumberofbloodtransfusionswere necessary.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1. HelitoCP,GobbiRG,CastrillonLM,HinkelBB,PécoraJR, CamanhoGL.Comparac¸ãoentreFloseal® eeletrocautériona hemostasiaapósartroplastiatotaldojoelho.ActaOrtopBras. 2013;21(6):320–32.

2. CardosoRT,SouzaJuniorEF,AlvesWC,BarbiFilhoF. Artroplastiatotaldojoelho:indicac¸ãodetransfusão sanguíneadeacordocomavariac¸ãohematimétricaeos sintomasclínicosdehipoperfusão.RevBrasOrtop. 2014;49(5):507–12.

3. HealyWL,DellaValleCJ,IorioR,BerendKR,CushnerFD, DaluryDF,etal.Complicationsoftotalkneearthroplasty:

standardizedlistanddefinitionsoftheKneeSociety.Clin OrthopRelatRes.2013;471(1):215–20.

4.VasconcelosJW,VasconcelosGA.Avaliac¸ãodaperda sanguíneanaartroplastiatotaldojoelhocomesemsoltura dotorniquete.ActaOrtopBras.2011;19(1):32–6.

5.SinghVK,SinghPK,JavedS,KumarK,TomarJ.Autologous transfusionofdraincontentsinelectiveprimaryknee arthroplasty:itsvalueandrelevance.BloodTransfus. 2011;9(3):281–5.

6.CrescibeneA,MartireF,GigliottiP,RendeA,CandelaM. Postoperativeautologousreinfusionintotalknee replacement.JBloodTransfus.2015;2015:826790. 7.MottaFilhoGR,CavanellasN.Artroplastiaminimamente

invasivadojoelho.RevBrasOrtop.2007;42(9):269–77. 8.VaneLA,GanemEM.Doac¸ãohomólogaversusautólogae

substitutosdahemoglobina.In:CavalcantiIL,CantinhoFAF, AssadAR,editors.Medicinaperioperatória.RiodeJaneiro: SociedadedeAnestesiologiadoEstadodoRiodeJaneiro; 2006.p.291–306.

9.HopewellS,OmarO,HydeC,YuLM,DoreeC,MurphyMF.A systematicreviewoftheeffectofredbloodcelltransfusion onmortality:evidencefromlarge-scaleobservationalstudies publishedbetween2006and2010.BMJOpen.2013;3(5). 10.ClaudioMM.Advancesinunderstandingoftoleranceof

normovolemicanemiatransfusionrequirementsincritically illpatients.In:28thWorldCongressoftheInternational SocietyofHematology;2000Aug26–30;Toronto, Canada.

11.SmithTO,HingCB.Isatourniquetbeneficialintotalknee replacementsurgery?Ameta-analysisandsystematicreview. Knee.2010;17(2):141–7.

Imagem

Table 1 – Infectious and noninfectious risks associated to homologous blood transfusions
Table 2 – Patients in whom a tourniquet was used.
Table 3 – Patients in whom a tourniquet was not used.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

A investigac¸ão de material coletado por swab de nasofa- ringe, no intuito de detectar a colonizac¸ão por Staphylococcus aureus e sua variante resistente à meticilina, em pacientes

It was observed that the intervention group, in which prophylaxis with nasal decolonization was used, 59 (1.09%) of the patients developed a surgical site infection, while in

para avaliar a taxa de consolidac¸ão das fraturas do polo proxi- mal do escafoide com o uso de EONV associado à fixac¸ão com parafuso de Herbert; 11 pacientes foram avaliados

Role of vascularized bone grafts in the treatment of scaphoid nonunions associated with proximal pole avascular necrosis and carpal collapse. Merrell GA, Wolfe SW, Slade

Isso levou ao desenvolvimento de métodos mais modernos, como a placa de compressão bloqueada do fêmur proximal (PF-LCP), uma opc¸ão viável para o tratamento dessas

The outcome in early cases of treatment of subtrochanteric fractures with proximal femur locking compression plate. Crist BD, Khalafi A, Hazelwood SJ,

Em nosso estudo ficou demonstrado que apesar de a radio- grafia ser um bom método para avaliar as estruturas ósseas e prever fraturas de quadril, quando comparado com um grupo

In the present study, it was demonstrated that although radio- graphy is a good method to evaluate bone structures and predict hip fractures, it was not sensitive enough to