• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.66 número2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.66 número2"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texto

(1)

REVISTA

BRASILEIRA

DE

ANESTESIOLOGIA

OfficialPublicationoftheBrazilianSocietyofAnesthesiology

www.sba.com.br

REVIEW

ARTICLE

Perioperative

cardiac

arrest:

an

evolutionary

analysis

of

the

intra-operative

cardiac

arrest

incidence

in

tertiary

centers

in

Brazil

Matheus

Fachini

Vane

a,∗

,

Rafael

Ximenes

do

Prado

Nuzzi

a

,

Gustavo

Fabio

Aranha

a

,

Vinicius

Fernando

da

Luz

a

,

Luiz

Marcelo

Malbouisson

a

,

Maria

Margarita

Castro

Gonzalez

b

,

José

Otávio

Costa

Auler

a

,

Maria

José

Carvalho

Carmona

a

aDisciplineofAnesthesiology,HospitaldasClínicasdaFaculdadedeMedicinadaUniversidadedeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil bHeartInstitue(InCor),HospitaldasClínicasdaFaculdadedeMedicinadaUniversidadedeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

Received14April2014;accepted26June2014 Availableonline7February2015

KEYWORDS

Intra-operative complications; Heartarrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Anesthesia

Abstract

Background: Greatchangesinmedicinehavetakenplaceoverthelast25yearsworldwide. Thesechangesintechnologies,patientrisks,patientprofile,andlawsregulatingthemedicine haveimpactedtheincidenceofcardiacarrest.Ithasbeenpostulated thattheincidenceof intraoperativecardiacarresthasdecreasedovertheyears,especiallyindevelopedcountries. The authorshypothesizedthat, asintherest ofthe world,theincidenceofintraoperative cardiacarrestisdecreasinginBrazil,adevelopingcountry.

Objectives:The aimofthisstudy was tosearchthe literaturetoevaluate thepublications thatrelatetheincidenceofintraoperativecardiacarrestinBrazilandanalyzethetrendinthe incidenceofintraoperativecardiacarrest.

Contents:Therewere4articlesthatmetourinclusioncriteria,resultingin204,072patients undergoingregionalorgeneralanesthesiaintwo tertiaryandacademichospitals,totalizing 627casesofintraoperativecardiacarrest.Themeanintraoperativecardiacarrestincidence forthe25yearsperiodwas30.72:10,000anesthesias.Therewasadecreasefrom39:10,000 anesthesiasto13:10,000anesthesiasintheanalyzedperiod,withtherelatedlethalityfrom 48.3%to30.8%.Also,themaincausesofanesthesia-relatedcauseofmortalitychangedfrom machinemalfunctionanddrugoverdosetohypovolemiaandrespiratorycauses.

Conclusions:Therewasaclearreductionintheincidenceofintraoperativecardiacarrestin thelast25yearsinBrazil.Thisreductionisseenworldwideandmightbearesultofmultiple

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:mfvane@uol.com.br(M.F.Vane).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.06.007

(2)

factors, includingnewlawsregulatingthemedicineinBrazil,incorporationoftechnologies, betterhumandevelopmentlevelofthecountry,andbetterpatientcare.

© 2014SociedadeBrasileirade Anestesiologia.Publishedby ElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrights reserved.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE

Complicac¸ões intraoperatórias; Paradacardíaca; Reanimac¸ão cardiopulmonar; Anestesia

Paradacardíacaperioperatória:umaanáliseevolutivadaincidênciadeparada cardíacaintraoperatóriaemcentrosterciáriosnoBrasil

Resumo

Justificativa: Nosúltimos25anosocorreramgrandesmudanc¸asnamedicinaemtodoomundo. Essasmudanc¸asdetecnologias,riscosdopaciente,perfildopacienteeleisqueregulam medica-mentostiveramimpactonaincidênciadeparadacardíaca(PC).Postula-sequeaincidênciade parada cardíaca intraoperatória (PCI)tem diminuído ao longodos anos, especialmente em paísesdesenvolvidos.Anossahipótesfoique,comonorestodomundo,aincidênciadePCI estádiminuindonoBrasil,umpaísemdesenvolvimento.

Objetivos: Oobjetivo deste estudofoi pesquisareavaliar naliteraturaaspublicac¸ões que relacionamaincidênciadePCInoBrasileanalisaratendêncianaincidênciadePCI.

Conteúdo: Descobrimosquatroartigosqueatenderamoscritériosdeinclusão,resultandoem 204.072 pacientes submetidos à anestesia regional ou geral em dois hospitais terciários e acadêmicos,totalizando 627casos dePCI.A médiade incidênciadePCI para operíodode 25 anosfoide30,72:10.000anestesias.Houveumadiminuic¸ãode39:10.000anestesiaspara 13:10.000anestesiasnoperíodoanalisado,comletalidaderelacionadade48,3%para30,8%. Alémdisso,asprincipaiscausasdemortalidaderelacionadasàanestesiamudaramdemau fun-cionamentodemáquinaseoverdosedemedicamentosparahipovolemiaecausasrespiratórias. Conclusões: Houveumaclarareduc¸ãonaincidênciadePCInosúltimos25anosnoBrasil.Essa reduc¸ão éobservadaem todoo mundo epode sero resultadode vários fatores,incluindo novasleisqueregulammedicamentosnoBrasil,incorporac¸ãodetecnologias,melhornívelde desenvolvimentohumanodopaísemelhorassistênciaaopaciente.

©2014SociedadeBrasileira deAnestesiologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda.Todosos direitosreservados.

Introduction

Cardiacarrest(CA)isthemostseriouspotentiallyreversible adverse event that can be present in the perioperative period setting. It is assumed that in-hospital arrest is an eventthathas greaterchance ofsurvival thaninpatients admittedforothermedicalconditions,withasurvivalrate ofabout15%,whileout-hospitalarrestshavepositive out-comesof 2---5% in most studies.1,2 Usually, in-hospitalCAs

areprecededbyhypotension,metabolicorelectrolyte

dis-turbances,andrespiratoryinsufficiency,andarepotentially

preventable or modifiable, making a greater survival rate

forin-hospitalCA.3---6

Regarding intraoperative cardiac arrest (ICA), its

inci-dencevariesfrom2.56to44casesper10,000procedures,

witha30-daymortalitythatcanreachupto70%.3,7---11These

differences in incidencemay varygreatly mainly because

thestudiedperiodvariessignificantlyfrom2to10yearsand

thereisalackofadequateepidemiologicalrecording.12The

importanceofthelengthofthestudytimeiscrucial,since

improvementsintechnologiesandinclinicalpracticesmay

haveimpactedthestudyperiod.13 Also,withtheemphasis

onpatientsafetyinanesthesiasincetheearly 1980s,and

withmoreconcentratedeffortstowardpatientsafetysince

the 1990s, a reduction of the incidence of perioperative

mortalitywasobserved.9,13,14

Thepatientrisksandprofilehavealsochangedoverthe

years,asthereisatrendinsubmittingpatientswithgreater

ageandcomorbiditiestosurgery.15---17PatientswithASAIII

orgreaterareresponsiblefor 92---96%of thepatientsthat

presented ICA.18,19 Anesthetic-related and

perioperative-relatedmortalitieshave decreased overthe past50years

consistently,despitetheincreaseinbaselineASAstatusand

patientcomplexity.

Also,thestudiedcountryhasanimpactintheincidence

ofICA.Thegreatestandmostconsistentdeclinewasseenin

developedcountries,ascanbeseenbysomestudiesin

Swe-denandintheUnitedStates.9,13,14,20Indevelopingcountries,

thereisalackofstudiesanalyzingthetrendsinICA.

The authors hypothesized that, as in the rest of the

world,theincidenceofICAisdecreasinginBrazil.Theaim

ofthis study wastosearchthe literatureto evaluatethe

publicationsthatrelate theincidenceofICAin Braziland

comparewiththoseseeninothercountries.

Methods

Inourstudy,ICAwasdefinedasthecardiacarrestpresent

attheoperatingroom.

We reviewed the scientific literature from MEDLINE,

(3)

search terms: Intra-operative, perioperative, CA, Brazil,

tertiaryhospitals,anesthesiacomplications,anesthesia

out-comes,cardiopulmonaryresuscitationandanestheticdeath.

Thetermswereusedcombinedandisolated.Articles

repor-tingICAcasesin tertiaryBrazilianhospitalswereincluded

andanalyzed.Also,thereferencesonthefoundtextswere

evaluatedforpossiblerelevantpapers.Datawereanalyzed

descriptively.

Inclusion

criteria

SincethegoalofthisstudywastoevaluatethetrendofICA

inBrazil,onlyBrazilianpaperswereconsideredforanalysis,

includingbothretrospectiveandprospectivestudies.Allof

thestudies were needed tomentionthe ICA incidencein

theoperatingrooms(ORs) ordiagnosticprocedure rooms,

fromallpatientssubmittedtoregionalorgeneral

anesthe-sia.Also,themortalityrates,causes,andoutcomesofCPR

hadtobepresent.

Allarticlesfoundwerereadandclassifiedaccording to

thedurationperiod,numberofpatients,numberand

inci-denceofarrests,mortality,etiologyandoutcomes.

Exclusion

criteria

SincetheaimofthisreviewwastoanalyzeICA,studiesthat

presentonlyanesthesia-relatedandintraoperative-related

mortalitieswerenotincluded.

Results

There were only 4 studies that met the inclusion

crite-ria(Table 1). The firststudy wasperformed by Ruiz Neto

etal.,whichanalyzedtheincidenceofICAover theyears

1982---1984, among 51,422 patients undergoing general or

regionalanesthesia.Thesecondandthirdstudieswere

con-ductedbyBrazetal.,whichanalyzedtheincidenceofICA

duringtheyears1988---1996 and1996---2005,reviewingthe

incidenceofICAin58,553and53,718patients,respectively.

The fourth study wasperformed by Sebbaget al.,during

theyear2007,whichincluded40,437patients.21 Together,

these studies analyzed the incidence of 204,072 patients

undergoingregionalorgeneralanesthesiaintwotertiaryand

academichospitals,whichresultedin627casesofICA.The

meanICAincidenceforthe25yearsperiodwas30.72:10,000

anesthesias(Table2).

AspresentedinTable2,theincidenceofICAdecreased

along the years, mainly after 2005. In the period of

1982---1984, the incidence of ICA had its greatest value

forbothoverallandemergencyarrests.During1988---2005,

the overall incidence of ICA decreased when compared

to the study performed by Ruiz-Neto et al., mainly due

to a fall in the emergency incidence of ICA. In 2007, a

great decrease in the incidence of ICA and lethality was

noticed, having an incidence of 13 ICA per 10,000

anes-thetics, withan immediatelethality of 30.8%.21 Although

the two studies performed by Braz et al. included

car-diacsurgery and PACU arrests,the study done by Sebbag

et al. did not. Cardiac surgery ICA and PACU arrests

were responsible, respectively, for 14.8% and 5.4% of

the total arrests during the years 1996---2005; 3.85% and

6.52%intheyears1988---1996.18,21,22Recalculatingthe

inci-dence ofICA,excludingcardiac surgeryandPACUarrests,

therewasanincidenceof 21.9:10,000anesthetics for the

years 1988---1996, 28.1:10,000 anesthetics for the years

1996---2005,and13:10,000in2007,againshowinga

reduc-tionofICAinthelastyears.7,18,21,22

Duringthefirstyearsoftheanalyzedperiod(1982---1984),

76.7% of ICA that occurred during elective surgeries was

related toanesthesiaand thecomorbidities were

respon-sibleforonly5.9%.Inthefollowingyears(1988---2007),ASA

physicalstatusgainedgreatimportance,beingmore

impor-tantthansurgicalor anestheticcausesofICA.Anesthesia,

aftertheyear1984,greatlydecreaseditsimportanceasthe

causeofICA,beinglessimportantthatsurgicalcausesand

ASAstatus.7,18,21,22Theincidenceoftheeventduringallof

theanalyzedperiodswashigherduringgeneralanesthesia

thanwithsubdural,epidural,sacralorregionalanesthesia.

ThemeanageofICAshowedanincreaseduringtheperiod

of1982---2007.Theagegroupthathadthegreatestincidence

ofICAintheyears1982---1984wasbetween20and49years

(27.4%),whileinthefollowingyears,theagegroupsgreater

than40yearshadthegreatestincidenceofICA.

The main causesof ICA alsovariedalong the analyzed

years. Duringthe years1982---1984, the main factors that

led to ICA were related to the surgery. Those related to

anesthesia were mainly anesthetic overdose, hypoxemia,

cardiocirculatory collapse after regional anesthesia, and

anesthesia machinemalfunction. In the years1988---1996,

hypoxia and hypoventilation were the leading cause of

anesthesia-relatedICA.Thesecausesresultedmainlyfrom

vomitaspiration,thoughnodifficultairwaywasmentioned.

Thesecond maincauseofICAduringthissameperiodwas

cardiocirculatorycollapseafterregionalanesthesia.22Inthe

years 1996---2005, the leading causeof anesthesia-related

ICA was also hypoventilation, but mainly due to difficult

airway.Hypoventilationwasfollowedbymedication-related

problems,whichincludedanestheticoverdosageandfluid

overload.Duringtheyear2007,themostcommoncauseof

thestudiedadverseeventswashypovolemia(42%),followed

byrespiratory(21%)andmetabolic(21%)disturbancesand

theICAmainlyoccurredduringthemaintenanceperiodof

generalorcombinedanesthesia.18,21,22

WhenanalyzingthelethalityoftheCA(calculated

divid-ing the number of deaths by the total CAs), in the years

1982---1984,itwas12%foranesthesia,76.3%forsurgeryand

46.4%forcomorbidities.InthestudyofBrazetal.duringthe

periodof1988---1996,theanestheticlethalityofICAwas24%

withanoveralllethalityof67.3%.Intheyears1996---2005,

theanesthesia-relatedlethalitykeptonraisingto33%,with

anoveralllethalityof63.4%.ThestudyperformedbySebbag

etal.doesnotprovideenoughdatatocalculate

anesthesia-relatedlethality,but 40%ofthe ICAwasat leastpartially

attributabletoanesthesia.Theoverallimmediatelethality

was30.8%,whichis apronouncedreductionfromthelast

studiedperiod(1996---2005).18,21,22

Theproportionofanesthesia-relatedCAtothetotal

num-ber of anesthesia also presented with changes along the

studiedperiod.Intheyears1982---1984,thisproportionwas

14.39:10,000 (7), while from 1988 to1996, it reduced to

0.85:10,000.Afterthisnadir,theproportionof

anesthesia-relatedCAtothetotalnumberofanesthesiakeptonraising

(4)

Table1 Summaryofthestudiesandrespectiveresults.

Author Period Locationofdata collection

Design n ICA Monitor

RuizNeto, RBA 1986 (REF)

1982---1984 HospitaldasClínicas, FacultyofMedicine, UniversityofSaoPaulo, SaoPaulo,SaoPaulo State,Brazil(Tertiary AcademicHospital)

Retrospective 51,422(38,652 electivesand 12,770 emergencies)

-205cases -Incidence:39: 10,000

-75.1%urgencies -24.9%electives

NIBP ECG

Braz, RBA1999

1988---1996 BotucatuSchoolof MedicineUniversity Hospital,SaoPauloState University,Botucatu,Sao PauloState,Brazil

Retrospective 58,553 -184cases -Incidence: 31.42:10,000 -68%urgencies -32%electives

NotSpecified

Braz, BJA2006

1996---2005 BotucatuSchoolof MedicineUniversity Hospital,SaoPauloState University,Botucatu,Sao PauloState,Brazil

-Prospective withmandatory qualitycheck 53,718 ---includes cardiac surgeries 186cases 34.6:10,000 -68%urg -32%electives

NIBP EKG SpO2 EtCO2 ConcO2 Gasanalysis Ventilometer Sebbag,

SPMJ2013

2007 HospitaldasClínicas, FacultyofMedicine, UniversityofSaoPaulo, SaoPaulo,SaoPaulo State,Brazil(Tertiary AcademicHospital)

-Prospective 40,379 52cases (13:10,000) -29%electives -71%urgencies

NIBP EKG SpO2 EtCO2 ConcO2 Gasanalysis Ventilometer Author Mortality (:10,000) Lethality (deathsdivided byCA)

CPRandORoutcome CausesofICA Results

RuizNeto,RBA 1986 (REF) -Electives 2:10,000 -Urgency 70:10,000 Anesthetic: 12% Surgical:76.3% Physical Status:46.4%

ROSCelectives:83.4% UrgencyROSC: 41.6%.

AfterROSC:59.4%Bad overallstatus(OS), 40.6%GoodandRegular OS.Thosewith anestheticcause:47% goodandregularOS.

-Electivesurgeries: mostly

anesthesia-related (76.5%)

-Urgencymostly surgical-related (59.7%)

- Urgen-cies>electives -Relatedfactors: Gender(male), age(elder),clinic (generalsurgery), moment(maint), Braz, RBA1999 -21.17:10,000 -Cause: Physicalstatus: 15.71:10,000 -Surgical: 4.61:10,000 -Anesthetic: 0.85:10,000 Anesthetic 23.8% Surgical58.7% Physicalstatus 78.6%

AfterROSC:55%BadOS, 20%regularOSand25% ingoodOS.

Thosewithanesthetic cause:71%goodOS.

-PhysicalStatus19.98 CPA:10,000 (anesthetics) -Anesthetics: 3.59:10,000 Surgical: 7.86:10,000

-88.59%intheOR -Factors:age (elder),gender (male),Physical Status3orhigher, urgency,general anest. Braz, BJA2006 -21.97:10,000 -Cause: Physicalstatus: 14.89:10,000 -Surgical: 5.96:10,000 -Anesthetic: 1.12:10,000 Anesthetic: 33.3% Surgical68.1% Physicalstatus 66.1%

Notspecified -DefinedbyCPAs commission: -Anesthetics: 3.35:10,000 -Surgicalpatient: 8.75:10,000 -Physicalstatus: 22.52:10,000 Anesthetic:1 ---respiratory(55.6%) 2---drugs(44.4%)

(5)

Table1(Continued)

Author Mortality (:10,000)

Lethality (deathsdivided byCA)

CPRandORoutcome CausesofICA Results

Sebbag, SPMJ2013

Upto30days ---10:10,000

-Overall immediate lethality: 30.8% -30-days lethalitywas 75%

-69%successfulCPRs Survivors:

-39%in24h -25%in30d -elect53% -emerg14%

-Definedretrospectively -Physicalstatus(52%) -Surgical(8%) -Anesthetic(40%)

-Relatedfactors: gender(male) -Physicalstatus (ASAIIIor+) -Emergency(71%) -Generalanest (90%)

ECG,continuouselectrocardiogram;NIBP,non-invasivebloodpressure;SpO2,pulseoximeter;OS,overallstatus;OR,operatingroom;

CPA,cardio-pulmonaryarrest;ROSC,returnofspontaneouscirculation;PACU,post-anesthesiacareunit.

1996---2005 and 5:10,000 in 2007).18 Although the number

ofICAandtheoverall lethalitygreatly decreasedin2007,

theproportionofanesthesia-relatedCAtothetotalnumber

ofanesthesiaincreased.18,21,22

Discussion

Alongthe25yearsanalyzedbythisreview,theincidenceof

ICApresentedwithchanges.Therewasobservedadecrease

inICAinBrazil,especiallyinthelastdecade.

In the 1980s, other studies around the world showed

that ICA ranged from 1 to 23 arrests/10,000 anesthesias

while,inBrazil,intheyears1982---1984,theincidenceofICA

washigherthan the worldwideincidence, with39:10,000

anesthesias.7,9,10,13,23,24Thisworldwideincidencewasfound

instudiesperformedindevelopedcountries,whichincluded

France,UnitedStatesofAmerica,SwedenandNetherlands.

TheFrenchstudy,whichpresentedwiththehighestICA

inci-dence amongthe developed countries,reported that the

mainanesthesia-relatedcausehadanimportantrelationship

withmedicationuse,whichwasinagreementwiththemain

causefoundinBrazil,whichwasanestheticoverdose.7Inthe

USA,whichhadthelowestincidenceofICA,enhanced

intra-operative monitoring, the introduction of pulse oximetry

andcapnometry,theroutineuseofdisconnectalarms,and

ageneralawarenessof thereportedmishapwerepointed

asimportantstepstoreducetheoverall incidenceof ICA,

resultinginthelowestincidenceofthereportedstudies.13

Atthisperiod,pulseoximetry,monitoredend-tidalCO2,and

defibrillators were not obligated by any legislation tobe

present inside the operating room in Brazil, which could

have had a negativeimpact in the ICA,since it can help

detect situations that can lead to CA, such as ventilator

failuresanddisconnection.Anesthesiamachinefailurewas

listed among the top causes of ICA in Brazil and wasnot

citedasanexpressivecauseofICAbyotherarticlesduring

thisdecade.24SincethestudydonebyRuiz-Netoetal.does

notprovide furtherdetails onthetypeofmachinefailure

noritspecifiestheanesthesiamachineused,wecan

specu-latethattheincorporationofcapnographsoralarmscould

have reducedthe incidenceof ICAasexpectedbyKeenan

andBoyan,butsincemachinefailureisavastterm,we

can-notaffirm thisstatement.13 Also,thedescriptivestudy of

RuizNetoetal.wasperformedinatertiaryteaching

hospi-tal,inwhichpatientshavemorecomorbidities,withagreat

numberofurgentandemergencysurgeries,inpatientsASA

PIVandV,whichcouldhaveanimportantroleinincreasing

theICAduringthisperiod.7

In the following decade, ASA physical status was the

mainfactorrelatedtoICA,followedbyhypoxemiabecause

of vomit aspiration. During this period, anesthetic

over-dose was notlisted asoneof the most important factors

thatcouldleadICA.The mostnoticeablechangewasthat

anesthesiawasnolongerthemainfactorrelatedtoICAin

electivesurgeries.Also,therewasanoticeablereductionin

the number ofICA relatedto anesthesiaand surgery, but

an increase in those related to the patient physical

sta-tus, especially thosepatients categorized asASA PIII, IV

and V. The number of CA related to anesthesia over all

of the anesthetic procedures performed and

anesthesia-relatedmortalitysuffered agreatdecrease.Part ofthese

results may be related to the introduction of a

Brazil-ian legislation in 1993, which included as mandatory the

monitoringofbloodpressure,theuseofprecordial

stetho-scope,andthepresenceofdefibrillatorsandrescuedrugsin

Table2 Incidenceofcardiacarrest(elective,emergencyandoverall),overalllethalityalongtheyears.Valuesofincidenceof cardiacarrestandmortalityarepresentedper10,000anesthetics.Lethalityispresentedinpercentages.

Years Overallincidence ofcardiacarrest (:10,000)

Incidenceofcardiacarrest inemergencycases (:10,000)

Incidenceofcardiac arrestinelectivecases (:10,000)

Overall lethality

1982---1984 39.0 120.0 13.0 48.3%

1988---1996 31.4 45.4 19.2 67.3%

1996---2005 34.6 55.4 19.4 63.4%

(6)

theoperatingtheater(FederalMedicineCouncilResolution Number 1363/93).25 The monitoring of end tidal CO

2 was

stillreservedforcertainproceduresandpulseoximetrywas

mandatoryonlyinhospitalsthatusedoxygenconcentration

plants.Althoughthislegislationincreasedpatientsafetyand

couldtheoreticallyreducetheincidenceandthelethalityof

ICA,an increase inoverall- and anesthetic-related

lethal-ities and a decrease in the incidence of ICA were found

during these years. The incorporation of these

technolo-gies might have an impact in preventable and promptly

reversible causes of ICA, such as hypoxia that could be

prevented by the use of oxymeters or by disconnection

alarms. But, some causes of ICA (i.e. cardiac infarction)

could not be prevented by the presence of monitors or

alarms. Usually, theses causes have more difficult return

to the spontaneous circulation, which could explain why

thelethalityincreasedalong theanalysedyears:less

pre-ventablecausesofICA.Also,duringthisdecade,asreported

by other studies, a noticeable increase in the number of

high-risksurgicalelderlypatientswasreported,whichmight

explaintheincreaseinthelethality.9,26,27

In 2007, a great decreasein the incidence of ICA and

lethality was noticed, having an incidence of 13 ICA per

10,000anesthetics, withan immediatelethalityof 30.8%.

AlthoughfewstudieshaveanalyzedtheICAincidencefrom

2005 up to now, this incidence lies in the middle of the

worldwideaverageforthisperiod,whichvariedfrom7to

44CAsper10,000anesthetics.11,28Thedecreaseinthe

inci-denceofICAmaybepartiallyexplainedbyanewlegislation

directed to anesthesia approved in the year 2006

(Fed-eralCouncil ofMedicine Resolution n◦ 1.802/2006).29 This

legislation required thatall patientshad a pre-anesthetic

consultbeforehospitaladmissionandestablishedthe

mini-mumworkingconditionstoperformanesthesia,whichmust

include, at least, non-invasive blood pressure

measure-ments, continuous ECG, pulse oximetry and capnography

forallpatients.Also,thisnewlegislationincludedminimum

monitorsforpost-anesthesiacareunit,whichincluded

non-invasivebloodpressureandpulseoximetry.Thislegislation

wasasteptowardanincreaseinpatientsafety,whichhas

beenaworldfocussinceearly1980sandwithmoreefforts

inthe1990s.Thisfocushasbeenparticularlyadoptedbyall

countries,butmainlyinhighhumandevelopmentindexed

countries.20

OnefacttoconsiderwhenanalyzingICAinBrazilisthatit

isadevelopingcountry,whichhasauniversalhealthsystem.

Thecountry’shumandevelopmentindex(HDI)isrelatedto

the rate of improvement in perioperative mortality

over-time,andthismightbearesultoftheabilityofwealthier

countries toincrease health-careinvestment in

technolo-gies,techniques,andtrainingnecessarytoimprovepatient

safety.20 As seen by anotherreview, thereis a worldwide

trendtoreducetheincidenceofICA,especiallyindeveloped

countries.20 Brazil isnoexception tothisrule,decreasing

from 39 ICA per 10,000 anesthetics to13 ICA per 10,000

anesthetics along these 25 years studied. Although Brazil

had, during the 1980s---1990s, a mean HDI of 0.56, which

wasclosetotheworldaverage(0.58)andfarfromveryhigh

(0.82)HDIcountries,itsincidenceofICAwasclosertothose

countrieswithlowHDI,beingmorethan30CAsper10,000

anesthetics.20 After the year 2000, especiallyin the year

2007,BrazilhadanincreaseintheHDI(0.71)andsatcloser

tohighHDI(0.74)countries,butitsincidenceofICAwasstill

farfromhighHDIcountries.20,30Thismightbeindicativeof

arelationshipbetweencountries’HDIandtheincidenceof

ICA,evensuggestingthattheincidenceofICAmightreflect

thecountry’shealthcaresystem.Thisisalsosupportedby

thefactthat,in2011,only4.1%ofthegrossnationalproduct

ofBrazilwasspentinthehealthsystem,whichislessthan

halfofwhattheUSAspentforpublichealth.30 Onefactto

consideristhatBrazilhasauniversalhealthsystem,while

USAdoesnot.

Althoughtherewerealmost 204,072patientsanalyzed,

which resulted in 627 cases of ICA, with an incidence

of 30.72:10,000 anesthesia during the 25 years period,

this review showed a decrease in ICA from 39:10,000 to

13:10,000.Allofthefourstudieswereperformedintertiary

teachinghospitals, whichmight have resulted in ahigher

incidenceofICA.Also,thesehospitalswerelocatedinthe

wealthierpartofBrazil,inonespecificstateofthecountry,

whichalsoisalimitationofthisreview.

Summary

TherewasareductionintheincidenceofICAinthelast25

yearsinBrazil.Thisreductionisseenworldwideandmight

bearesultofmultiplefactors,includingnewlawsregulating

themedicineinBrazil,incorporationoftechnologies,better

humandevelopmentlevelofthecountry,andbetterpatient

care.

Funding

Institutionalfunding.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

References

1.Girardi LN, BariePS. Improved survival after intraoperative cardiac arrest in noncardiac surgical patients. Arch Surg. 1995;130:15---8,discussion19.

2.Schneider2ndAP,NelsonDJ,BrownDD.In-hospital cardiopul-monaryresuscitation:a30-yearreview.JAmBoardFamPract. 1993;6:91---101.

3.Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Rosenthal RA, et al. Cardiac arrest among surgical patients: an analysis of incidence, patient characteristics, and outcomes in ACS-NSQIP. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:14---21.

4.Bedell SE, Deitz DC, Leeman D, et al. Incidence and char-acteristics of preventable iatrogenic cardiac arrests. JAMA. 1991;265:2815---20.

5.Ebell MH, Afonso AM. Pre-arrest predictors of failure to surviveafterin-hospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation:a meta-analysis.FamPract.2011;28:505---15.

6.MartinezJP.Prognosisincardiacarrest.EmergMedClinNAm. 2012;30:91---103.

(7)

8.Kawashima Y, Takahashi S, Suzuki M, et al. Anesthesia-related mortality and morbidity over a 5-year period in 2,363,038patientsinJapan.ActaAnaesthesiolScand.2003;47: 809---17.

9.Olsson GL, Hallen B. Cardiac arrest during anaesthesia. A computer-aidedstudyin250,543anaesthetics.Acta Anaesthe-siolScand.1988;32:653---64.

10.Chopra V, Bovill JG, Spierdijk J. Accidents, near accidents and complicationsduringanaesthesia.A retrospective analy-sis of a 10-year period in a teaching hospital. Anaesthesia. 1990;45:3---6.

11.Boonmak P, Boonmak S, Sathitkarnmanee T, et al. Surveil-lance of anesthetic related complications at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University,Thailand.J MedAssoc Thai. 2005;88:613---22.

12.Goswami S, Brady JE, Jordan DA, et al. Intraoperative cardiacarrestsinadultsundergoingnoncardiacsurgery: inci-dence, risk factors, and survival outcome. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:1018---26.

13.KeenanRL,BoyanCP.Decreasingfrequencyofanesthetic car-diacarrests.JClinAnesth.1991;3:354---7.

14.SprungJ,Warner ME,ContrerasMG,etal.Predictorsof sur-vivalfollowingcardiacarrestinpatientsundergoingnoncardiac surgery:astudyof518,294patientsatatertiaryreferralcenter. Anesthesiology.2003;99:259---69.

15.RoquesF,NashefSA,MichelP,etal.Riskfactorsandoutcome inEuropeancardiacsurgery:analysisoftheEuroSCORE multi-nationaldatabaseof19030patients.EurJCardiothoracSurg. 1999;15:816---22,discussion822---3.

16.Ferguson Jr TB, Hammill BG, Peterson ED, et al. A decade of change-risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary arterybypassgrafting procedures,1990---1999:areportfrom theSTS National DatabaseCommittee and the DukeClinical ResearchInstitute.SocietyofThoracic Surgeons.AnnThorac Surg.2002;73:480---9,discussion489---90.

17.AlexanderKP,AnstromKJ,MuhlbaierLH,etal.Outcomesof car-diacsurgeryinpatients>or=80years:resultsfromtheNational CardiovascularNetwork.JAmCollCardiol.2000;35:731---8.

18.BrazLG,ModoloNS,doNascimentoJr P,etal.Perioperative cardiacarrest:astudyof53,718anaestheticsover9yrfroma Brazilianteachinghospital.BrJAnaesth.2006;96:569---75.

19.Newland MC, Ellis SJ, Lydiatt CA, et al. Anesthetic-related cardiac arrest and its mortality: a report covering 72,959 anestheticsover10years fromaUS teachinghospital. Anes-thesiology.2002;97:108---15.

20.Bainbridge D, Martin J, Arango M, et al. Perioperative and anaesthetic-related mortality in developed and developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;380:1075---81.

21.SebbagI,Carmona MJC,GonzalezMMC, et al. Frequency of intraoperativecardiac arrestand medium-termsurvival. Sao PauloMedJ.2013;131:309---14.

22.BrazJR,SilvaACM,CarlosE,etal.Cardiacarrestduring anes-thesiaatatertiaryteachinghospital(1988to1996).RevBras Anestesiol.1999;49:257---62.

23.PottecherT,TiretL,DesmontsJM,etal.Cardiacarrestrelated toanaesthesia:aprospectivesurveyinFrance(1978---1982).Eur JAnaesthesiol.1984;1:305---18.

24.OtteniJC,PottecherT,TiretL,etal.Arretcardiaquependant l’anesthesie et la periode de reveil. Donnees de l’enquete INSERM1978-1982[Cardiac arrestduring anesthesia and the recoveryperiod.DatafromtheINSERMsurvey1978---1982].Ann FrAnesthRéanim.1986;5:287---94.

25.Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine Resolution 1.363/93; 1993.

26.KlopfensteinCE,HerrmannFR,MichelJP,etal.Theinfluence ofanagingsurgicalpopulationontheanesthesiaworkload:a ten-yearsurvey.AnesthAnalg.1998;86:1165---70.

27.TiretL,DesmontsJM,HattonF,etal.Complicationsassociated withanaesthesia---aprospectivesurveyinFrance.CanAnaesth SocJ.1986;33:336---44.

28.ZuercherM,UmmenhoferW.Cardiacarrestduringanesthesia. CurrOpinCritCare.2008;14:269---74.

29.BrazilianFederalCouncilofMedicineResolution;2006. 30.WorldBank[databaseontheInternet]WorldDevelopment

Imagem

Table 1 Summary of the studies and respective results.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

We used the American Academy of Orofacial Pain questionnaire to assess the temporomandibular disorder signs and symptoms one-day postoperatively (T1), and the patients’ baseline

Results: Peripheral blood lymphocyte apoptosis was seen immediately in the postoperative period and was accompanied by a decrease of the number of T cells and B cells.. There were

Background and objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different doses of intrathecal morphine on postoperative analgesia, postoperative first

postoperative pain in patients who had undergone abdomi- nal hysterectomies and found that the VAS scores of patients who received IV esmolol infusion at a rate of 50

This study aims to compare the efficacy of single preemptive dose of oral naproxen sodium versus a new combination of oral naproxen sodium-codeine phosphate on postoperative pain

In this study, which compared levobupivacaine solutions containing 3%, 4% or 5% dextrose for unilateral spinal anaes- thesia, while successful unilateral spinal block was provided

Patients in Group P (pregabalin group) received 150 mg of pregabalin orally 1 h prior to induction of anesthesia with sips of water and patients in Group C (control group)

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between thenar eminence and the I-gel’s cuff dimensions regarding width and length in paediatric