• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. ortop. vol.52 número5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. ortop. vol.52 número5"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texto

(1)

r e v b r a s o r t o p . 2017;52(5):535–537

SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ORTOPEDIA E TRAUMATOLOGIA

w w w . r b o . o r g . b r

Original

article

Fat

embolism

syndrome

in

femoral

shaft

fractures:

does

the

initial

treatment

make

a

difference?

Jânio

José

Alves

Bezerra

Silva

,

Diogo

de

Almeida

Diana,

Victor

Eduardo

Roman

Salas,

Caio

Zamboni,

José

Soares

Hungria

Neto,

Ralph

Walter

Christian

IrmandadedaSantaCasadeMisericóridiadeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received29July2016 Accepted30August2016

Availableonline14September2017

Keywords:

Femoralfractures Fracturefixation Multipletrauma Fatembolism

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Objective:Toidentifytheriskfactorscorrelatedwiththeinitialtreatmentperformed.

Methods:This isa retrospective study involvinga total of272patients diagnosed with femoralshaftfractures.Ofthepatients,14%werekeptatrestuntilthesurgicaltreatment, 52%underwentexternalfixation,10%receivedimmediatedefinitivetreatment,and23% remainedinskeletaltraction(23%)untildefinitivetreatment.

Results:Thereweresixcasesoffatembolismsyndrome(FES), whichshowedthat poly-traumaisthemainriskfactorforitsdevelopmentandthatinitialtherapywasnotimportant.

Conclusion: PolytraumapatientshaveagreaterchanceofdevelopingFESandtherewasno influencefromtheinitialtreatment.

©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora Ltda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Síndrome

da

embolia

gordurosa

na

fratura

diafisária

de

fêmur:

o

tratamento

provisório

faz

diferenc¸a?

Palavras-chave:

Fraturasdofêmur Fixac¸ãodefratura Traumatismomúltiplo Emboliagordurosa

r

e

s

u

m

o

Objetivo:Identificarosfatoresderiscoecorrelacioná-loscomotratamentoinicial.

Métodos:Estudo retrospectivo que envolveu 272 pacientes com diagnóstico de fratura diafisáriadefêmur;14%permaneceramemrepousoatéotratamentocirúrgico,52%foram submetidos afixac¸ãoexterna,10%fizeramotratamentodefinitivoimediatoe23% per-maneceramcomtrac¸ãoesqueléticaatéotratamentodefinitivo.

Resultados: Foramseiscasosdesíndromeda emboliagordurosa(SEG), nosquaisse evi-denciouqueopolitraumaéoprincipalfatorderiscoparaseudesenvolvimentoequeo tratamentoinicialinstituídonãooinfluenciou.

PaperdevelopedatSantaCasadeSãoPaulo,DepartamentodeOrtopediaeTraumatologia,GrupodeCirurgiadoTrauma,SãoPaulo, SP,Brazil.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:janioalves@gmail.com(J.J.Silva). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.021

(2)

536

rev bras ortop.2017;52(5):535–537

Conclusão: Pacientespolitraumatizadosapresentaramumamaiorchancededesenvolver SEGenãohouveinfluênciadotratamentoinicialinstituído.

©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevier EditoraLtda.Este ´eumartigoOpenAccesssobumalicenc¸aCCBY-NC-ND(http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Introduction

Thereleaseoffattyemboliintothebloodstreamcanleadto lesionanddysfunctionofoneormoreorgans,definedasfat embolismsyndrome(FES),mainlyduetothemobilityinthe focusofthefracture1;however, despitenewprotocols with

aggressivesupportandintensivetherapy,itremainsaconcern inshaftfracturesoflongbones.2–4Thus,earlyskeletal

stabi-lizationissuggestedtopreventthissyndrome.1However,the

decisionontheapproachtobeuseddependsonthepatient’s clinicalpictureandavailabilityofresources.5

Thepresentstudyaimsatidentifyingtheriskfactorsfor fatembolism syndrome,and tocorrelateitwiththe initial treatmentestablished.

Casuistry

and

method

This is a retrospective observational study based on data frompatients’recordsfrom theDepartmentofOrthopedics andTraumatology, seen betweenJanuary2011and Decem-ber2015.Theinformationcollectedincludesepidemiological data,traumamechanism,fractureclassificationaccordingto theAOclassification,6treatmentused,andclinicaloutcome

regardingthepresenceorabsenceofFES.

Patientswithadiagnosisoffemoralshaftfractureofboth genders,withaminimumageof16yearswereincluded,and patientswithafractureinapathologicalbonewereexcluded. Two groupswere considered:polytraumatized and non-polytraumatized. The former group included those with multiplelesionsexceedingadefinedseverity(ISS≥17).6

Regarding the initial treatment, they were divided into: rest (patients who were kept resting in bed with cush-ions), transtibial skeletal traction; external fixation for damage control, and definitive surgical treatment, either withintramedullarynail or fixationwithplate andscrews. No patient was definitively treated with external fixation (Table1).

Table1–Distributionofpatientsastoinitialtreatment.

Initialtreatment n %

Rest 39 14.3

Externalfixation 144 52.9

Definitive 27 9.9

Skeletaltraction 62 22.8

n,numberofpatients.

Source:Dataobtainedfrommedicalrecordsstudied.SAME,ISCMSP andHEFR.

Ofthepatients,272patientswhosemedicalrecordswere reviewed met the inclusion criteria. There were 43 (16%) femalepatientsand229(84%)malepatients.Asfortheage group,theywerepredominantlybetween16and30years(63%) (Table2).FESwasevidencedinsixcases(2.2%).

Regardingthemechanismoftrauma,therewasa predom-inanceofvictimsofmotorcycleaccidents(57%),followedby caraccidents(17%),andfalls(14%).

WeusedtheAO6groupclassificationforthefracturesand

obtainedthefollowingdistributionaccordingtoFig.1. Forty-three patients were considered polytraumatized (ISS>17)(16%),and67(25%)hadcompoundfractures.

Results

Five out of229 male patients(2.2%) developedFES,and in thegroupof43femalepatientsweobservedonlyone(2.3%) (p=0.954).

TherewasaprevalenceofFESinadults,mainlybelow30 years(83.3%),butwithoutstatisticalsignificance(p=0.302).

Considering only the fact that the patient was poly-traumatized as a variable, out of 43, five (12%) developed FES, and in the non-polytraumatized group, only one did (p<0.001).

Sixpatients(4%)developedFES,fivewerepolytraumatized, ofthe144casesundergoingexternalfixationasinitial treat-ment.

Inthegroupof43polytraumatizedpatients,30underwent externalfixation,andofthesefive(17%)developedFES.Inthe remainderofthegroup(13patients),fourweresubmittedto bedrest,fourhaddefinitivetreatmentintheemergencyroom, fiveunderwentskeletaltraction,butnoneofthesecaseshad FES.

Regarding theAOclassification,6 patientswithFESwere

distributedbetween32-B2(50%),32-A2(33%)and32-A3(17%). WedidnotfindcasesofFESamongpatientswithfractures classifiedas32-C.

Table2–Distributionofpatientsbyagegroup.

Agegroup n %

16–30years 172 63.2

31–40years 48 17.6

41–50years 19 7.0

51–60years 10 3.7

Over61years 23 8.5

n,numberofpatients.

(3)

rev bras ortop.2017;52(5):535–537

537

0.0% 6.6%

13.6% 34.9%

6.3% 18.4%

9.9%

2.6% 2.2% 5.5%

32-A1 32-A2 32-A3 32-B1 32-B2 32-B3 32-C1 32-C2 32-C3 5.0%

10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%

Fig.1–DistributionofpatientsbyAOclassification.

Source:Datafrommedicalrecordsstudied.SAME,ISCMSP

andHEFR.

Discussion

FES is related to multiple factors, such as trauma energy, patient predisposition and initial resuscitation.1,7 Pinney

etal.8describedthatthereisarelationofFESinyoungadult

patients,becausetheyareabletosurvivehighenergytraumas, whichfavorsthissyndrome.Ourstudyshowedthatamongthe sixpatientswithFES,fivewerelessthan30yearsold,butthis wasalsotheageatwhichthisfracturewasmoreprevalent, with172patients(63%).Thus,thereisapredominanceofFES inthegroupofyoungadults,butwithoutstatistical signifi-cance(p=0.302).Thesamewasobservedforthemalegender, inwhichfemoralshaftfractures weremorecommon (84%) andaccountfor83%ofpatientswithFES.

Theinitialmanagement ofapatientwith femoralshaft fracturedependsontheclinicalconditionsoftheirhospital admission,takinginto accountthe conceptsalready estab-lishedintheliteratureofEarlyTotalCareandDamageControl. In the patients submitted to definitive primary treatment, therewasnoFES,whichcorroboratesstudiesbyBoneetal.9

andLasanianosetal.7Theydemonstratedthattheearly

fixa-tionoftheindividualfemoralshaftfractureinstablepatients maybebeneficial.

Inthegroupofpatientswithindicationoftemporary fixa-tion,Scannelletal.demonstratedthattherewasnodifference inclinicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingbothexternal fix-ation(EF)and skeletal traction.10 Inourstudy,therewas a

higherprevalenceofFESinEFpatients(p<0.02),andnocases ofFESinthoseundergoingskeletaltraction,orbedrest. How-ever,amongthepatientsundergoingEF,in144(sixwithFES), 30werepolytraumatized(fivewithFES),whichwasconsidered themostimportantfactor(p=0.016).

Regarding the classification of fractures (classification AO6),whichtakesintoaccounttheenergyofthetrauma, a

higherprevalenceoftypeCfractureswasexpectedinpatients withFESbecausetheyarefractures withgreater instability andgreatermobilityinthefocus;therefore,agreaterrelease offatemboli isexpected.1,6 However,inourstudy,typeB2

fractures werethe mostprevalent intheFESpatientgroup (50%),butamongthese50patientswithfractureclassification AO32-B2,eightwerealsopolytraumatized(twowithFES),and 42 non-polytraumatized(one withFES).If wewere to mea-suretherelationshipbetweenembolismandpolytraumain this groupoffractures,therewasnostatisticalsignificance betweenthesevariables(p=0.098).

Conclusion

ThepolytraumatizedpatientismorelikelytodevelopFES,and inourcasuistrytheinitialtreatmentdidnotinfluenceinits development.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1.WhiteT,PetrisorBA,BhandariM.Preventionoffatembolism syndrome.Injury.2006;37Suppl.4:S59–67.

2.RobinsonCM.Currentconceptsofrespiratoryinsufficiency syndromesafterfracture.JBoneJointSurgBr.

2001;83(6):781–91.

3.FilomenoLTB,CarelliCR,SilvaNCLF,BarrosFilhoTEP, AmatuzziMM.Emboliagordurosa:umarevisãoparaaprática ortopédicaatual.ActaOrtopBras.2005;3(4):96–208.

4.SaigalR,MittalM,KansalA,SinghY,KolarPR,JainS.Fat embolismsyndrome.JAssocPhysIndia.2008;56:245–9. 5.PapeHC,GiannoudisPV,KrettekC,TrentzO.Timingof fixationofmajorfracturesinbluntpolytrauma:roleof conventionalindicatorsinclinicaldecisionmaking.JOrthop Trauma.2005;19(8):551–62.

6.RuediTP,BuckleyR,MoranCG.AOprinciplesoffracture management.2nded.NewYork:Thieme-Verlag;2007. 7.LasanianosNG,KanakarisNK,DimitriouR,PapeHC,

GiannoudisPV.Secondhitphenomenon:existingevidenceof clinicalimplications.Injury.2011;42(7):617–29.

8.PinneySJ,KeatingJF,MeekRN.Fatembolismsyndromein isolatedfemoralfractures:doestimingofnailinginfluence incidence?Injury.1998;29(2):131–3.

9.BoneLB,JohnsonKD,WeigeltJ,ScheinbergR.Earlyversus delayedstabilizationoffemoralfractures:aprospective randomizedstudy,1989.ClinOrthopRelatRes. 2004;(422):11–6.

Imagem

Table 2 – Distribution of patients by age group.
Fig. 1 – Distribution of patients by AO classification.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Objetivo: Comparar ângulos radiológicos do fêmur proximal em pacientes com escorre- gamento proximal da cabec¸a do fêmur (EPCF) e analisar se a avaliac¸ão por

Conclusion: Multiplanar assessment of proximal femoral deformity in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis is a viable option, with the potential to modify the disease

Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo que envolveu 272 pacientes com diagnóstico de fratura dia- fisária de fêmur; 14% permaneceram em repouso até o tratamento cirúrgico, 52% foram submetidos

Conclusion: In the present study, the frequency of primary and secondary osteoporosis chemoprophylaxis in patients who were admitted with fragility fractures was low, as well as

Foram elegíveis os pacientes entre 18 e 60 anos internados com fratura exposta no setor de traumatologia e ortopedia da emergência do HPSC, de janeiro a maio de 2014, e.. que

Objective: To identify the infection rate in adult patients with open fractures treated at two tertiary hospitals in the city of Canoas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.. Methods:

Conclusão: O uso de placas e parafusos convencionais é uma opc¸ão viável na fixac¸ão da osteotomia tibial alta em cunha de abertura, pois proporciona estabilidade suficiente

This retrospective study reports a series of cases of high tibial osteotomy performed using the medial opening wedge technique, wherein the fixations were performed using con-