• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Braz. J. Phys. vol.32 número2B

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Braz. J. Phys. vol.32 número2B"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texto

(1)

The Role of Alpha Partiles in the Emission

of Plasma Waves Inside Solar Ejeta

S.Dasso 1;2

,F.T. Gratton 1

, and C.J. Farrugia 3

1

InstitutodeFsiadelPlasma,CONICET-FCEyN/UBA,

CiudadUniversitaria,Pab.1, 1428BuenosAires,Argentina

2

Institutode Cienias,UniversidadNaionalde GeneralSarmiento,

CampusUniversitario,JoseM.GutierrezentreJoseL.SuarezyVerdi,

1613LosPolvorines,Prov. deBuenosAires,Argentina

3

Institute fortheStudyofEarth, Oeans,andSpae,

UniversityofNewHampshire,Durham,NH03824, USA

Reeivedon26Deember,2001

Theenhanementoftheresonantinstabilityofright-handpolarizedeletromagnetiionylotron

wavesbyalphapartilesforphysialparametersorrespondingtooronalmassejetionsisstudied.

Wefousontheeets ofalphathermalanisotropyandrelativeHe ++

=H +

abundaneongrowth

andabsorptionrates. Therstparametergovernsdiretlywaveemission,whiletheseondmodies

alsothewavespeedandindiretlyenhanesthewaveexitation.

I Introdution

Solar ejeta(alsooronalmassejetions, CMEs) area

heterogeneousset ofobjetswiththefollowingplasma

properties: (i)lowprotonplasmabeta(see[1℄and

refer-enes therein),(ii) bidiretionalstreaming(along eld

lines) of suprathermal eletron heat uxes (few

hun-dreds of eV)[2℄ and energeti protons ( 1 MeV)[3℄,

(iii) avariable n

=n

p

relativeproton-to-alphapartile

density whih may be muh higher than the average

solar wind value of 4%[4, 5℄, and (iv) a thermal

anisotropy(A=T

k =T

?

1)whihisoftennegativei.e.,

T

k >T

?

, forbothprotonsand eletrons(see

Rihard-son et al., 1997[6℄ and referenes therein). The last

two properties may hold only in parts of the ejeta.

Althoughphysial parametersofCMEsevolveasthey

propagate awayfrom the sun, theyhange little on a

timesaleofseveralhours. Theexitationofright-hand

polarizedeletromagnetiionylotronwaves(EICWs)

depends sensitively on a number of parameters: the

proton beta (

p

=8nT

p =B

2

), the alpha-proton

tem-perature ratio (T

=T

p

), the alpha-proton density

ra-tio (

= n

=n

p

), the thermal anisotropy of eah

speie (A

p = T

k;p =T

?;p

1, for protons, with similar

denitions for alpha partiles and eletrons), and the

eletron-protontemperatureratio(T

e =T

p ).

Thepossibility ofright-hand polarized wave

ativ-ityinCMEsduetothenegativeprotonanisotropywas

[8℄, Dasso et al., 1999 [9℄, Dasso et al., 2000 [10℄, and

Dasso et al., 2001 [11℄. Here, we fous on the

inu-ene of A

and

on the growth (and absorption)

rates of the waves. The former is a little known

pa-rameter not yet routinely measured in CMEs.

How-ever,onthebasisofmagnetimomentonservationin

an expandingmagneti eld,weexpetthat all

parti-le speies willdevelopanegativethermalanisotropy.

Thus, it seems plausible that A

will have the same

signofA

p

,i.e.,negativeinmostsolarejeta. The

exi-tationofright-handpolarizedEICWsisdueto

anoma-lous Cherenkov emission, and relies on a small

num-berofions(intheMaxwelliantail)that resonatewith

the wave[12℄. As we shall show, there are frequeny

ranges where emission overomes absorption for

neg-ative anisotropy. Thus, a negative A

, and

,

on-tributediretlytothegrowthrate. However,theeet

of

ismostlyindiret: addinginreasestheinertia

of theplasma and thereby redues the phase veloity

ofthewave. Thus, moreions(protonsandalphas)are

brought into resonane. This leads to a onsiderable

enhanementofEICWativityin helium-rih plasmas

withrespetto low

ongurations.

II Dispersion Relation

The instabilityof right-hand polarizedEICWs

(2)

k 2 2 =! 2 + X s ! 2 ps A+

(A+1)!+A

kw k Z( !+ kw k ) s ; (1) d

(summed overspeies indexed by s = eletrons,

pro-tons, and alphas; angular frequeny ! [! = !

r +i℄;

wavenumberparallel to the ambienteld k; ylotron

frequeny ; plasma Zeta funtion Z). In (1), all

speiesaremodelledbybiMaxwelliandistribution

fun-tions. Here, !

ps

is the plasma frequeny; w

k =

p

2T

k

=m,isthethermalspeed(temperaturein energy

units and m is the massof the partile); and is the

speedoflight. Wavequantitiesvaryasexp[i(kz !t)℄,

wherethez axisisalignedwiththemagnetield.

In the following, frequeniesand growth rates are

normalizedtotheprotonylotronfrequenyx=!=,

where = eB

0 =m

p (B

0

is the bakground

mag-neti eld intensity); and the normalizedwavenumber

y = kv

a

=, where v

a = B 0 = p 4n p m p

is the proton

Alfvenveloity. Foraplasmaomposedofprotons,

al-phas,andeletrons,Eq. (1)anbewrittenas

y 2 =A p + A p

(x+1)+x

y 1=2

k;p Z(

x+1

y 1=2 k;p )+ A + A

(x+1=2)+x

y 1=2

k;

Z(

x+1=2

y 1=2 k; ) +A e e 1 + 3=2 e 1=2 A e (x 1

)+x

y 1=2 k;e Z( x 1 y 1=2 k;e 1=2 e 1=2

): (2)

d

The following parameters

k;p = 8n p T k;p =B 2 0 , k; = (8n p T k; =B 2 0 )(m p =m ), and k;e = 8n e T k;e =B 2 0

, =m

e =m p , and e =n e =n p havebeen

introdued. We solve the dispersion relation

numeri-ally usinganinhouseodefortheZetafuntion.

Pa-rametersareobtainedfromstatistialsurveys[2,6℄and

otherasestudies. Fromtherootsofthedispersion

re-lation,weobtaintheomplexdimensionless frequeny

x=x

r

+ig,asafuntion ofthewavenumbery.

III Results

Theparametern

=n

p

inCMEsishighlyvariable[2,6℄,

with n

=n

p

rangingfrom verysmall to valuesashigh

as 15 20%[5℄. We onsider variations of A

around moderateA

p

values, hosen herein the range

T

k =T

?

= 2 3. Results of alpha partile eets on

the growth and absorption rates of the EICW

insta-bility are presentedin gures1-4. Fig. 1showsfrom

toptobottomtheabsorptionandemissionranges,and

the phase speed, all shown asafuntion of

, whih

parametrizes the various urves. We show results for

=0, =0:04,

=0:08,and

=0:15. The

ele-trons are isotropi,A

e

=0. Theother parametersare

A =A = 0:67, =0:4, and T =T = 4. An

in-reasein

inreasesgrowthratesandshiftstheative

rangeto lowerfrequeny. When

=0:15,the

maxi-mumvalueof thegrowthrateis ==8x10 4

whih

oursfor!==0:56. Thisorrespondstoane-folding

time()of15minutesfora15nT magnetield. Sine

typial CMEs evolutiontimes are many hours, this

valueissuÆientlyshorttoallowtheinstabilityto

de-velop.

Whentheabsolutevalueofthealphapartile

ther-mal anisotropy is inreased with respet to the ase

A

=A

p

,anenhaementofgrowthratesanda

broad-eningof theemission range ensues. Infat, an

inre-mentoftheparalleltemperatureofthealphapartiles,

keepingtheaveragetemperature(T

=T

p

=4)onstant,

inreases

k;

, whih in turn augments the

instabil-ity. This eet an be observed in the Fig. 2, where

we vary A

(= 0:5; 0:58; 0:67; 0:75) while

keep-ing other parameters xed at A

p = 0:67, p = 0:4, T =T p =4,

=0:15. AgainA

e

=0. ForA

= 0:75,

themaximumgrowthrateis g =2x10 3

,and the

un-stable x

r

intervalextends from 0:2 to 1:8.

Con-versely,whenA

=A

p

issmallerthan1,theativerange

is redued and the low-frequeny ut-o of the

ab-sorption is shifted to lower frequenies. For example,

whenA

=A

p

dereasesby14%,from A

=A

p =1to

(3)

shiftedtox

r

0:9. Atx

r

=1,wendinstabilitywith

agrowth rateg =3:5x10 4

when A

= A

p

= 0:67.

WhenA

= 0:58,at thesamefrequenywend

ab-sorptioninstead,withdampingrate g=5x10 5

.

Figure 1. Dimensionless damping rate g, growth rate g

and wavenumbery versus dimensionless frequeny xr for

right-hand polarized EICWs. Dependene on (with

Ap = A = 0:67, p = 0:4, T=Tp = 4, and Ae = 0

onstants).

Figure 2. Same as Fig. 1 but showing on A

(with

A

p

= 0:67,

p

= 0:4, T

=T

p = 4,

= 0:15, T

e = T

p ,

andA

e

=0onstants).

Weinludetheontributionofanisotropieletrons

in gures 3 and 4. Fig. 3 shows a ase in whih

the instability is eliminated (and we obtain

absorp-tion instead) when A

goes from A

= 0:5(= A

p )

to A

= 0:4keepingA

p

= 0:5,

p

=0:4, T

=T

p =4,

=0:08,T =T ,andA = 0:5onstant.

Figure 3. Same as Figure 2, with Ap = 0:5, p = 0:4,

T=Tp=4,=0:08,Te=Tp,Ae=Aponstants.

Somewhat larger absolute values of anisotropies

are onsidered in Fig. 4. Here, we hoose A

=

0:4; 0:5; 0:67; 0:75,foraongurationwithA

p =

0:67,

p

= 0:4, T

=T

p =4,

= 0:08, T

e = T

p , and

A

e

= 0:67. A gap in the unstable range (seond

panel)is formed when A

= 0:4. In thisgap an

ab-sorptionband appears.

Figure 4. Same as Figure 2, withAp = 0:67, p = 0:4,

T=Tp=4,=0:08,Te=Tp,Ae=Aponstants.

IV Conlusions

Summarizing, we examined the eet of variations in

thermal anisotropy and abundane of alpha partiles

on the growth and absorption rates of EICWs in

pa-rameter regimes typial of many CMEs. Inreasing

n

=n

p

and/orthealpha-to-protonanisotropyratio

pro-dueenhanementsofgrowthandabsorptionrates. An

inrementofn

=n

p

alsoshiftstheativerangetolower

frequenies. Whentheratioofalpha-to-protonthermal

anisotropy inreases, an absorption band may appear

between twounstableranges. Toadvane studies like

the one reported here, it would be desirable to

mea-surethealphapartilethermalanisotropyroutinelyin

CMEs,sineaswehaveshowntheright-handpolarized

(4)

The alpha abundane also inuenes the growth rate

byits eetonthephaseveloityofthewaves. These

propertiesmayhelptoexplainthespetrumoflow

fre-queny utuationsseenin manyCMEsby WIND at

1AU[14℄.

Aknowledgments

Work partially supported by Argentinian grants

UBACyT(TX032/98andX059/2001)and CONICET

PIP 4536/96, and USA NASA grant NAG5-2834and

livingwithastargrantNAG5-10883.

Referenes

[1℄ J.T. Gosling, inCoronal Mass Ejetions, edited by N.

Crooker,J.A.Joselyn,andJ.Feynman,9,(AGU,

Wash-ington,1997).

[2℄ J.T. Gosling, D.N.Baker, S.J. Bame, W.C. Feldman,

andR.D.Zwikl,J.Geophys.Res.,92,8519(1987).

[3℄ R.G. Mardsen, T.R. Sanderson, C. Tranquille, K.P.

Wenzel, and E.J. Smith, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 11009

(1987).

[4℄ G.Borrini,J.T.Gosling,S.J.Bame,andW.C.Feldman,

J.Geophys.Res.,87,7370(1982).

[5℄ A.B.Galvin, inCoronal Mass Ejetions, edited by N.

Crooker, J.A. Joselyn, and J. Feynman, 253 (AGU,

[6℄ I.G.Rihardson, C.J.Farrugia,and H.V.Cane,J.

Geo-phys.Res.,102,4691(1997).

[7℄ C.J. Farrugia, F.T. Gratton, G. Gnavi, and K.W.

Ogilvie,J.Geophys.Res.,103,6543 (1998).

[8℄ F.T. Gratton, S.Dasso,and C.J. Farrugia,inPro.of

1998 Int. Congress on Plasma Physis &25 th

Euro-pean Physial Soiety Conf on Controlled Fusion and

PlasmaPhysis,Praha,editedbyP.Pavlo,ECA,

Euro-peanPhysialSoiety,22C,1122 (1998).

[9℄ S. Dasso, F.T. Gratton, and C. J. Farrugia, in Solar

WindNine,editedbyS.Habbaletal.,AIPConf.Pro.,

471,669-672(1999).

[10℄ S.Dasso,F.T.Gratton,C.J.Farrugia,andG.Gnavi,in

TheSolarWind-MagnetosphereSystem3,71-80,edited

byH.K.Biernat,C.J.Farrugia,and D.F.Vogl,

Aus-trianAademyofSienePress,Vienna(2000).

[11℄ S.Dasso, C.J. Farrugia, F.T. Gratton, R.P.Lepping,

K.W. Ogilvie, and R.J. Fitzenreiter, Adv. Spae Res.,

28,5,747-752(2001).

[12℄ C.F.KennelandF.L.Sarf,J.Geophys.Res.,73,6149

(1968).

[13℄ T.H.Stix,WavesinPlasmas(AIM,NewYork,1992).

[14℄ L.Janoo,C.J.Farrugia,R.B.Torbert,J.M.Quinn,A.

Szabo,R.P.Lepping,K.W.Ogilvie,R.P.Lin,D.

Lar-son,J.D. Sudder,V. A.Osherovih,andJ.T.

Imagem

Figure 1. Dimensionless damping rate g, growth rate g

Referências

Documentos relacionados

rheologial behavior of holesteri liquid rystal

thermal diusivity and the optial absorption oeÆient of one side dyed polymer foils..

these ratios... Normalized PAS intensity in the NIR range for the peaks ratio a) Peak1/Peak2 of PEg samples; b) Peak2/Peak3.

(I) as a funtion of the frequeny (f ) it was possible to ev aluate a harateristi time () in order.. of magnitude as a funtion of the temperature

In this devie the hole transport layer is obtained using a thin lm of 1-(3-methylphenyl)-.. 1,2,3,4 tetrahydroquinoline-6-arboxyaldehyde-1,1'-diphenylhydrazone (MTCD), while

point (whih ours for P/D 13 for long exible

for prodution of thermotropi liquid rystalsC. The hiral fragment synthesised was

we onsider the mehanism of photoalignment of liquid rystals both in the bulk and at the surfae.. by a photosensitive