• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.64 número6

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.64 número6"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texto

(1)

LETTERSTOTHEEDITOR 447

Continuous

bilateral

transversus

abdominis

plane

block

after

abdominal

surgery

Bloqueio

do

plano

transverso

abdominal

contínuo

bilateral

após

cirurgia

abdominal

DearEditor,

I read with great interest the article of Lima et al.1

concerning the use of continuous local anesthetic infu-sion via catheters placed bilaterally in the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) for postoperative analgesia after exploratory laparotomy. I congratulate them on the pre-sentation of thecase. However,I wouldlike toaddsome comments.

TAP block has become an important method of post-operativepainmanagementfor patientsundergoinglower abdominalsurgeryasaresultof itseffectiveness,relative easeof establishment andlow rateofcomplications.2We

agree withthe authors that it is important toassess the idealconcentrationandvolumeforbolus andinfusion and proper placement of the catheterwithin TAP. But in this sense,besidesthe efficacy,thesafetyissue shouldnotbe forgotten.Thus, theinstillationof large volumesinto the TAPbilaterallycanleadtosignificantintravascular concen-trationsoflocal anesthetic,evenexceedingthethreshold of toxicity.3 Thus,Hessian etal. in a recentinvestigation

determinedrelativelyhighcumulativedosesofropivacaine, assessingropivacaineplasmaconcentrationsduringasimilar continuousinfusionintotheTAPasproposedbytheauthors.4

Thereby,despite markedindividualvariability,carefulrisk benefitassessmentshouldbeperformedbeforecontinuous TAPblocks,especiallyinelderlypatients,renalor hepatic dysfunctionand gestation.5 The main objectiveof a

con-tinuoustechniqueshouldbeadministeringthelowesttotal dose of a local anesthetic effective to prevent undesir-able effects due to toxicitybecause otherwise I consider thatitdoes notprovide additionalbenefitwithrespectto a technique based onbolus administration into the TAP.6

Thus, in our institution, we use bilateral TAP catheters inserted by ultrasound imagingin the Triangle of Petitor inapostero-subcostallevelaccordingtothetypeof surgi-calincision, basedonbilateralcontinuousinfusion of0.2% ropivacaine 2mL/h for up to 50h with previous admin-istration of bolus of 5mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and 10mL throughbothcathetersbeforeremoving them,with excel-lentresults.

Likewise,theauthorsasertthat‘‘althoughtoxicplasma concentrations of local anesthetic have been detected, there areno reports of clinical signs of systemic toxicity associated with local anesthetic’’; however, the previous

studiesreportedseveral casesof symptomatic local anes-thetictoxicity.4,7

Moreover, the authors claim that ‘‘although TAP pro-videssuperioranalgesiacomparedtoplacebo,thevisceral pain, etc., remains, which requires the addition of IV opioidsin the blockade’’. It should be remembered that posteriorapproachtotheTAPpermitsspreadoflocal anes-theticsolutiontotheparavertebralspaceandpartofthis also results in some degree of epidural spread of local anesthetic. This extension to the central nervous system might explain patients requiring minimal extra analgesia postoperatively.8

TheoptimalsiteofinsertionofTAPcatheters,theideal localanestheticsolution,volumeandoptimalinfusionrate areyettobedetermined.Thisrequiresmorerigorous sci-entificinvestigation.

References

1.LimaIF,LindaF,DosSantosA, etal.ContinuousbilateralTAP blockinpatientwithpriorabdominalsurgery.RevBras Aneste-siol.2013;63:422---5.

2.McDonnell JG, O’Donnell B, Curley G, et al. The analgesic efficacyoftransversus abdominisplaneblockafterabdominal surgery:aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial.AnesthAnalg. 2007;104:193---7.

3.SharkeyA,FinnertyO,McDonnellJG.Roleoftransversus abdomi-nisplaneblockaftercaesareandelivery.CurrOpinAnaesthesiol. 2013;26:268---72.

4.Hessian EC, Evans BE, Woods JA, et al. Plasma ropivacaine concentrations during bilateral transversus abdominis plane infusions.BrJAnaesth.2013;111:488---95.

5.Gómez-Ríos MÁ. Continuous transversus abdominis plane cathetertechniqueforpostoperativeanalgesiaafterabdominal surgery.AnaesthIntensiveCare.2013[inpress].

6.NirajG, KelkarA,JeyapalanI,etal. Comparisonofanalgesic efficacy ofsubcostal transversus abdominis planeblocks with epiduralanalgesiafollowingupperabdominalsurgery. Anaesthe-sia.2011;66:465---71.

7.GriffithsJD,LeNV,GrantS,etal.Symptomaticlocalanaesthetic toxicityandplasmaropivacaineconcentrationsafter transver-susabdominisplaneblockforCaesareansection.BrJAnaesth. 2013;110:996---1000.

8.FinnertyO,McDonnellJG. Transversusabdominisplaneblock. CurrOpinAnaesthesiol.2012;25:610---4.

ManuelÁngelGómez-Ríos

DepartmentofAnesthesiaandCriticalCare,Complejo HospitalarioUniversitariodeACoru˜na,ACoru˜na,Spain E-mail:magoris@hotmail.com(M.A.Gómez-Ríos). Availableonline12March2014

Referências

Documentos relacionados

When they compared the different sugammadex doses, they observed that the time to reach 0.90 TOF ratio was significantly shorter with sugammadex doses ≥2 mg kg − 1.. 23 reported that

Nuestro estudio indicó que la administración de sugammadex para la reversión del BNM inducido por rocu- ronio está posibilitando una reversión más rápida y también más segura del

tigated the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine on bleeding, haemodynamic parameters, and postoperative analgesia in their study that included over 40 patients scheduled for

Por tanto, comparamos en nuestro estudio los efectos del magnesio y de la dexmedetomidina, medicamentos usados durante CES en pacientes bajo anestesia general, evaluando la calidad

This study sought to determine the incidence of emergence delirium and risk factors in patients at a specialist pediatric hospital in Kingston, Jamaica.. Methods: This was

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether several distances from the insertion point of needle to the ipsilateral clavicular notch, running directly (denoted as I- IC),

I-C-IC, distancia del punto de inserción de la aguja hasta la incisión clavicular ipsilateral a través de la clavícula; I-IC, distancia directa del punto de inserción de la aguja

Compar- ing the groups in terms of movement response to tracheal intubation, there was no significant difference between Group Es250 (50%) and Group Es150 (56%) but Group Es50